xml-soap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kailash Aynor" <akail...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: what do we call this beast?
Date Fri, 04 Aug 2000 14:41:02 GMT
Don't we need to give any indication of usage of Java for its implementation. I mean sooner
or later we might have a C++ implementation. Which might go under the same heading as this
one, with only the implementation language difference.
So looking at it, I would suggest "Apache JSoap" ?

Kail.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Steven J. McDowall 
  To: soap-dev@xml.apache.org 
  Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 8:17 AM
  Subject: RE: what do we call this beast?



  I agree.. Apache Soap is a very logical name. xml-soap is odd since of
  course
  it uses XML.. but it is NOT from the XML people (w3c)..


  -----Original Message-----
  From: Mika.Laitio@sysline.com [mailto:Mika.Laitio@sysline.com]
  Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 1:05 AM
  To: soap-dev@xml.apache.org
  Subject: Re: what do we call this beast?



  I think that Apache Soap is the best and natural way to call this engine.
  My vote for it.

  Mika




                      "Sanjiva
                      Weerawarana"          To:     "Apache SOAP"
  <soap-dev@xml.apache.org>
                      <sanjiva@watso        cc:
                      n.ibm.com>            Subject:     what do we call this
  beast?

                      04.08.2000
                      08:09
                      Please respond
                      to soap-dev





  Is the Apache SOAP implementation called "XML SOAP" or "Apache SOAP"?
  Or something else? The first version (same as IBM SOAP v1.2 repackaged)
  was called XML SOAP.

  Unless someone comes up with something better I prefer Apache SOAP.

  What do others feel? If there's no real consensus we'll do a vote.

  Sanjiva.









Mime
View raw message