xml-rpc-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Rall <...@finemaltcoding.com>
Subject Re: logging
Date Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:07:43 GMT
Jason van Zyl <jason@zenplex.com> writes:

> On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 14:44, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > [moving discussion to dev list]
>> 
>> Jason van Zyl <jason@zenplex.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 16:28, Miguel DeAvila wrote:
>> > > It would be helpful if the xmlrpc package supported logging via log4j rather
then printing to System.err ...
>> >> 
>> >> thoughts?
>> >
>> > If anything we should probably think about moving towards using the
>> > commons logging package.
>> 
>> This would be very useful, but again raises the question of how to
>> deal with external dependencies.  Many users are using the client code
>> from an applet (I assume that no one is using the server?), and extra
>> downloads (like most things) are always a PITA from applets.  Building
>> the external dep's code into the XML-RPC JAR is not a good idea, as it
>> leads to conflicts and LinkageErrors, the cause of which are very,
>> very difficult to debug (especially in apps which use multiple JARs,
>> some of which come from different class loaders).
>
> The commons-logging jar is pretty small, I think ~20k, and it will use
> it's standard SimpleLogger if no real logging implementations are
> present. I think this is bearable and would definitely make logging
> easier and more flexible.

I say go for it.  Looks like general sentiment has this implementation
moving away from being easily usable from applets.

Mime
View raw message