xml-rpc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Rall <...@finemaltcoding.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH]: Alternative type mappings for primitive types.
Date Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:51:20 GMT
Ryan Hoegg <rhoegg@isisnetworks.net> writes:

> Daniel Rall wrote:
> 
> >"Andrew Evers" <aevers@redwood.nl> writes:
> >
> >
> 
> >>>From an overall embedding perspective it would be nice to specify
> >>a property hash to a number of the constructors that could be
> >>used to specify alternative classes for not only the type factory,
> >>but also the request or response processor, or the worker. This
> >>would provide more graceful construction as more optional features
> >>are added.
> >>
> >>The JNDI InitialContext and JAXP {SAXParser,DocumentBuilder}Factory
> >>API's use similar concepts.
> >>
> 
> >
> >Interested in patching?
> >
> 
> 
> You might be interested in the Commons Discovery project, which
> provides a standard (?) way to find implementations of a given
> interface.  I am going to look into this as a possibility for
> streamlining the new XmlRpcTransport interface code I am working on
> with Andrew Evers.
> 
> 
> Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/discovery.html
> 
> Good place to get a quick and dirty idea of what this stuff does:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/discovery/apidocs/org/apache/commons/discovery/DiscoverClass.html

Would this dependency only be necessary on the server side, or would
it be a requirement on the client side as well?
-- 

Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com>

Mime
View raw message