Hello,
I have a question regarding namespaces for attributes, and how to declare
such attributes in an XML schema.
The reason that I want to use namespaces for an attribute is that I use XML
DSig,
and the signature parts should be specified with an "ID" attribute.
The name of the attribute that specify the identification could have any
name, and some possible choices are "ID", "Id" or "id".
However, there seems to be a recommendation to use "xml:id", rather than
anything else such as "ID".
This is for example described in the following page:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-id/
This works fine for DSig signatures.
I am using "xmlsec1" for signing/verification in my C++ application, and I
am able to sign and verify the signature.
In the XML files, the id is specified like this:
<elm:MyElement xml:id="MyName" OtherAttribute="SomeValue">
Note that "xml:id" is an attribute in a namespace, which is rarely used
although legal XML.
However, the XML files should also be validated against a schema with
Xerces, and it is there I have some problems.
The problem is probably that I do not specify the schema correctly, rather
than a problem in Xerces-C.
I have tried to specify the attribute name as "xml:id" in the scheme like
this:
==========================================
<xs:attribute name="xml:id" use="required">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:enumeration
value="MyName"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:attribute>
==========================================
However, when I try to validate the document, I get the following error
message:
==================================
Error at file XMLParserInput, line 1, char 441
Message: attribute '{http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace}id' is not
declared for element 'Routing'
==================================
My XML document has an "xml:id" attribute, but the Xerces validator does
not seem to think
that this attribute is declared according to the schema.
My question now is how I should write the XML schema to make it accept
"xml:id"?
I have searched on the net, and I have got some hints, for example this:
http://xsd.stylusstudio.com/2004Oct/post01004.htm
But my XML schema is more complicated, and consists of several xsd files
and multiple namespaces,
so I have not been able to make it validate with Xerces.
My XML file declares something similar to the following:
===============================
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-env
elope" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:qwerty="
http://www.mycompany
.se/qwert" xmlns:abcd="http://www.mycompany.se/abcd">
===============================
The schema file(s) declares information similar to this:
===============================
<xs:schema xmlns:abcd="http://www.mycompany.se/abcd" xmlns:xs="
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchem
a" targetNamespace="http://www.mycompany.se/abcd"
elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFor
mDefault="unqualified">
===============================
Can you give some hints how I should declare the XML schema to validate the
XML file with xml:id?
Regards
/Mikael
I will do that, thanks. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Michael Glavassevich [mailto:mrglavas@ca.ibm.com] > Verzonden: maandag 31 december 2012 21:36 > Aan: general@xml.apache.org > Onderwerp: Re: Getting FOP emedded examples to work > > Hello Arjan, > > There is a FOP users mailing list [1]. You're more likely to get > assistance from the FOP community if you asked your question there. > > Thanks. > > [1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/maillist.html#fop-user > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Technologies and WAS Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org > > Arjan Bokx <arjan.bokx@akb-ls.nl> wrote on 31/12/2012 04:30:41 AM: [snip question about Apache Fop] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
B.J. Herbison wrote:
>
> I wanted to look at the source of xml-commons and follow the browse link from http://xerces.apache.org/xml-commons/
to http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xml/commons/ and received a 404.
>
> What is the correct link to browse the source?
Find it now under Xerces:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xerces/
Followup discussions at the Xerces mailing lists.
-David
>
Thanks,
>
B.J.
> B.J. Herbison
> Veracode, Inc.
> BJHerbison@Veracode.com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
I wanted to look at the source of xml-commons and follow the browse link from http://xerces.apache.org/xml-commons/
to http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xml/commons/ and received a 404.
What is the correct link to browse the source?
Thanks,
B.J.
B.J. Herbison
Veracode, Inc.
BJHerbison@Veracode.com
Hello Arjan, There is a FOP users mailing list [1]. You're more likely to get assistance from the FOP community if you asked your question there. Thanks. [1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/maillist.html#fop-user Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org Arjan Bokx <arjan.bokx@akb-ls.nl> wrote on 31/12/2012 04:30:41 AM: > Hello everybody, > > I have a question about getting the "embedded" examples of FOP 1.1 to work. > Is this the right place to ask? > (If not, please redirect me and disregard the following) > > I've downloaded and installed fop 1.1 > I've downloaded and installed Ant. > With Ant, I compiled the "embedded" examples. > "Ant example1" correctly runs ExampleFO2PDF. > What should I do to call ExampleFO2PDF from Java? Actually I wish to > call it from Delphi, using JNI, but first things first. > "Java ExampleFO2PDF" gives: > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > ExampleFO2PDF (wrong name: embedding/ExampleFO2PDF) > > When I add just about every path to the classpath with the command > line option -cp, I get: > Error: Could not find or load main class ExampleFO2PDF.main > > Could you help me please. > > > Regards, > Arjan Bokx > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Hello everybody, I have a question about getting the "embedded" examples of FOP 1.1 to work. Is this the right place to ask? (If not, please redirect me and disregard the following) I've downloaded and installed fop 1.1 I've downloaded and installed Ant. With Ant, I compiled the "embedded" examples. "Ant example1" correctly runs ExampleFO2PDF. What should I do to call ExampleFO2PDF from Java? Actually I wish to call it from Delphi, using JNI, but first things first. "Java ExampleFO2PDF" gives: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: ExampleFO2PDF (wrong name: embedding/ExampleFO2PDF) When I add just about every path to the classpath with the command line option -cp, I get: Error: Could not find or load main class ExampleFO2PDF.main Could you help me please. Regards, Arjan Bokx --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Suppose that there is a sudden power failure. In that case, some of the memory fragments will fail to write to file. Then again the xml structure could become inconsistent. How do we deal with this then? Paul Libbrecht-4 wrote: > > How about using DOM/JDOM/XOM to assemble the fragments to memory then > output them (with an outputter thread or after the things are done). > > If this is really massive, you could try to output the threads to separate > files then merge things? > > paul > > > Le 22 oct. 2012 à 12:21, pa7751 a écrit : > >> Hi I have an xml file that has to be written by multiple threads running >> in parallel. How can we ensure that the structural integrity of the xml >> file i.e. many threads writing into the file can spoil the structure of >> the xml. One way is to make the write method synchronized, but that is a >> very high level approach with which only one thread may write at a time. >> So the other threads are ready with their data but cannot write until the >> lock is released. Is there a better way to do this? >> View this message in context: Multi threading and xml >> Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Multi-threading-and-xml-tp34585906p34588261.html Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
How about using DOM/JDOM/XOM to assemble the fragments to memory then output them (with an outputter thread or after the things are done). If this is really massive, you could try to output the threads to separate files then merge things? paul Le 22 oct. 2012 à 12:21, pa7751 a écrit : > Hi I have an xml file that has to be written by multiple threads running in parallel. How can we ensure that the structural integrity of the xml file i.e. many threads writing into the file can spoil the structure of the xml. One way is to make the write method synchronized, but that is a very high level approach with which only one thread may write at a time. So the other threads are ready with their data but cannot write until the lock is released. Is there a better way to do this? > View this message in context: Multi threading and xml > Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
How about using DOM/JDOM/XOM to assemble the fragments to memory then output them (with an outputter thread or after the things are done). If this is really massive, you could try to output the threads to separate files then merge things? paul Le 22 oct. 2012 à 12:21, pa7751 a écrit : > Hi I have an xml file that has to be written by multiple threads running in parallel. How can we ensure that the structural integrity of the xml file i.e. many threads writing into the file can spoil the structure of the xml. One way is to make the write method synchronized, but that is a very high level approach with which only one thread may write at a time. So the other threads are ready with their data but cannot write until the lock is released. Is there a better way to do this? > View this message in context: Multi threading and xml > Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi I have an xml file that has to be written by multiple threads running in parallel. How can we ensure that the structural integrity of the xml file i.e. many threads writing into the file can spoil the structure of the xml. One way is to make the write method synchronized, but that is a very high level approach with which only one thread may write at a time. So the other threads are ready with their data but cannot write until the lock is released. Is there a better way to do this? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Multi-threading-and-xml-tp34585906p34585906.html Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
JAXP has been part of the platform since Java SE 1.4. You can rely on it. Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org pa7751 <pa7751@gmail.com> wrote on 10/10/2012 02:13:40 AM: > Hi > > Actually I did, and so I got more and more confused, with so many options > being talked about. So I want to know if JAXP can be used as such from jdk > 1.4 to 1.6 or does that have to be integrated with some 3rd party parser? > > Thanks > > > Michael Glavassevich-3 wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Did you do any research before asking your question? If you search mailing > > list archives or on sites like Stack Overflow [1] you'll find plenty of > > views on various approaches to processing XML and their pros/cons. > > > > Thanks. > > > > [1] http://www.stackoverflow.com > > > > Michael Glavassevich > > XML Technologies and WAS Development > > IBM Toronto Lab > > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com > > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org > > > > pa7751 <pa7751@gmail.com> wrote on 09/10/2012 08:16:38 AM: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> I have a requirement where i have a valid xml that I need to parse so > > that > >> the elements of the xml can be made to behave in some manner. I need to > > know > >> two things: > >> > >> 1. Which parser is best to use DOM, SAX etc. > >> 2. Which parser library can I use. Here please note that my JRE can be > > 1.4 o > >> 1.6. So my code should be compatible with these versions > >> > >> > >> Note that my xml may not be very big in size. It can have a maximum of > > 200 > >> elements maybe > >> -- > >> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-parse- > >> xml-tp34531631p34531631.html > >> Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-parse- > xml-tp34531631p34535758.html > Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Hi Actually I did, and so I got more and more confused, with so many options being talked about. So I want to know if JAXP can be used as such from jdk 1.4 to 1.6 or does that have to be integrated with some 3rd party parser? Thanks Michael Glavassevich-3 wrote: > > Hi, > > Did you do any research before asking your question? If you search mailing > list archives or on sites like Stack Overflow [1] you'll find plenty of > views on various approaches to processing XML and their pros/cons. > > Thanks. > > [1] http://www.stackoverflow.com > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Technologies and WAS Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org > > pa7751 <pa7751@gmail.com> wrote on 09/10/2012 08:16:38 AM: > >> Hi >> >> I have a requirement where i have a valid xml that I need to parse so > that >> the elements of the xml can be made to behave in some manner. I need to > know >> two things: >> >> 1. Which parser is best to use DOM, SAX etc. >> 2. Which parser library can I use. Here please note that my JRE can be > 1.4 o >> 1.6. So my code should be compatible with these versions >> >> >> Note that my xml may not be very big in size. It can have a maximum of > 200 >> elements maybe >> -- >> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-parse- >> xml-tp34531631p34531631.html >> Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-parse-xml-tp34531631p34535758.html Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Hi, Did you do any research before asking your question? If you search mailing list archives or on sites like Stack Overflow [1] you'll find plenty of views on various approaches to processing XML and their pros/cons. Thanks. [1] http://www.stackoverflow.com Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org pa7751 <pa7751@gmail.com> wrote on 09/10/2012 08:16:38 AM: > Hi > > I have a requirement where i have a valid xml that I need to parse so that > the elements of the xml can be made to behave in some manner. I need to know > two things: > > 1. Which parser is best to use DOM, SAX etc. > 2. Which parser library can I use. Here please note that my JRE can be 1.4 o > 1.6. So my code should be compatible with these versions > > > Note that my xml may not be very big in size. It can have a maximum of 200 > elements maybe > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-parse- > xml-tp34531631p34531631.html > Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Hi I have a requirement where i have a valid xml that I need to parse so that the elements of the xml can be made to behave in some manner. I need to know two things: 1. Which parser is best to use DOM, SAX etc. 2. Which parser library can I use. Here please note that my JRE can be 1.4 o 1.6. So my code should be compatible with these versions Note that my xml may not be very big in size. It can have a maximum of 200 elements maybe -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-parse-xml-tp34531631p34531631.html Sent from the Apache XML - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
On 23/07/2012 14:59, Danut Clapa wrote: > Hello, Hi Danut, > I seen that the latest version of the FOP is 1.1rc. Taking in consideration that is an release candidate. Do you have any information when will be next stable release after 1.1rc? You don't need to cross post your question to multiple lists. Please avoid doing so in future. Thanks. To answer your question; the plan is to release FOP 1.1 a few weeks after 1.1rc1 when we've had sufficient feedback to be sure the release is sufficiently stable. Thanks, Chris > > Thank you, > > > > Danut Clapa > Senior Java Developer > TIC > Phone 0314138592 > danut.clapa@uti.ro > Sos. Oltenitei, nr 107 A, corp C1, Etaj 5 > 107-111A Oltenitei > RO-041393 Bucuresti 4 > Romania > www.uti.eu.com <http://www.uti.eu.com%20/> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Hello, I seen that the latest version of the FOP is 1.1rc. Taking in consideration that is an release candidate. Do you have any information when will be next stable release after 1.1rc? Thank you, Danut Clapa Senior Java Developer TIC Phone 0314138592 danut.clapa@uti.ro Sos. Oltenitei, nr 107 A, corp C1, Etaj 5 107-111A Oltenitei RO-041393 Bucuresti 4 Romania www.uti.eu.com <http://www.uti.eu.com%20/>
Thanks. That'll be me not being on general@xml. :) My suggestion is that the xml.apache.org site is rewritten to be historical, then moved over to be under the Attic (post the board resolution to dissolve the TLP - https://attic.apache.org/resolution.html). Hen On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Michael Glavassevich <mrglavas@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > I thought the board report [1] Gianugo posted to the list covered that. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/egh4l2pmbniyogbj > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Parser Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com > E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org > > hyandell@gmail.com wrote on 08/17/2011 12:35:08 AM: > >> Once that's done, is it time to move xml.apache.org to the Attic and >> close down the PMC? >> >> You've just beaten Jakarta; BSF's moving into Commons which leaves >> JMeter as the last, most likely TLP-bound, subproject. >> >> Hen >> >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Gianugo Rabellino >> <gianugo@apache.org> wrote: >> > Further to lack of volunteering on the headsup given to the XIndice >> > mailing lists (http://s.apache.org/xindice-attic-thread), and with two >> > existing committers in agreement on moving the project to the Attic, >> > here is an official vote to make it happen. >> > >> > This vote will be open for 72 hours from now. Everyone is welcome to >> > chime in, but the only binding votes will be from the XML PMC members, >> > and I'm asking to keep the XIndice mailing list in the loop. >> > >> > Please cast your vote as follows: >> > >> > [+1] Move XIndice to the Attic >> > >> > [ 0] I don't really care >> > >> > [-1] No, don't move it to the Attic and I volunteer to find an >> > alternate solution >> > >> > >> > Here is my +1. >> > >> > -- >> > Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it >> > Blog: http://boldlyopen.com >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
I thought the board report [1] Gianugo posted to the list covered that. [1] http://markmail.org/message/egh4l2pmbniyogbj Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org hyandell@gmail.com wrote on 08/17/2011 12:35:08 AM: > Once that's done, is it time to move xml.apache.org to the Attic and > close down the PMC? > > You've just beaten Jakarta; BSF's moving into Commons which leaves > JMeter as the last, most likely TLP-bound, subproject. > > Hen > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Gianugo Rabellino > <gianugo@apache.org> wrote: > > Further to lack of volunteering on the headsup given to the XIndice > > mailing lists (http://s.apache.org/xindice-attic-thread), and with two > > existing committers in agreement on moving the project to the Attic, > > here is an official vote to make it happen. > > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours from now. Everyone is welcome to > > chime in, but the only binding votes will be from the XML PMC members, > > and I'm asking to keep the XIndice mailing list in the loop. > > > > Please cast your vote as follows: > > > > [+1] Move XIndice to the Attic > > > > [ 0] I don't really care > > > > [-1] No, don't move it to the Attic and I volunteer to find an > > alternate solution > > > > > > Here is my +1. > > > > -- > > Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it > > Blog: http://boldlyopen.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Once that's done, is it time to move xml.apache.org to the Attic and close down the PMC? You've just beaten Jakarta; BSF's moving into Commons which leaves JMeter as the last, most likely TLP-bound, subproject. Hen On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Gianugo Rabellino <gianugo@apache.org> wrote: > Further to lack of volunteering on the headsup given to the XIndice > mailing lists (http://s.apache.org/xindice-attic-thread), and with two > existing committers in agreement on moving the project to the Attic, > here is an official vote to make it happen. > > This vote will be open for 72 hours from now. Everyone is welcome to > chime in, but the only binding votes will be from the XML PMC members, > and I'm asking to keep the XIndice mailing list in the loop. > > Please cast your vote as follows: > > [+1] Move XIndice to the Attic > > [ 0] I don't really care > > [-1] No, don't move it to the Attic and I volunteer to find an > alternate solution > > > Here is my +1. > > -- > Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it > Blog: http://boldlyopen.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
The big news from the XML project is that we finally managed to start the process of moving XIndice to the Attic. The vote just passed, and the move will start in the next few days. Once we are done with that, it will be time for a last call to the various xml-related projects to see what we should do with the existing xml web properties (DTDs and other resources), then we will be able to fold the XML project altogether. No other issues requiring board attention at this time. -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Thanks to the last minute vote from Shane we were able to gather the missing +1 to move XIndice to the Attic. The vote passes with 3 binding +1 (Gianugo, Gareth and Shane), 3 non-binding +1 (Carol, Mark, Catherine) and a non-binding +0 (Natalia). Thanks for the participation. The move will start in the next few days. -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Gianugo Rabellino <gianugo@apache.org> wrote: > Further to lack of volunteering on the headsup given to the XIndice > mailing lists (http://s.apache.org/xindice-attic-thread), and with two > existing committers in agreement on moving the project to the Attic, > here is an official vote to make it happen. > > This vote will be open for 72 hours from now. Everyone is welcome to > chime in, but the only binding votes will be from the XML PMC members, > and I'm asking to keep the XIndice mailing list in the loop. > > Please cast your vote as follows: > > [+1] Move XIndice to the Attic > > [ 0] I don't really care > > [-1] No, don't move it to the Attic and I volunteer to find an > alternate solution > > > Here is my +1. > > -- > Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it > Blog: http://boldlyopen.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
(unless anyone chimes in, I'm going to post this later today) The big news from the XML project is that we finally managed to start the process of moving XIndice to the Attic. The vote just passed, and the move will start in the next few days. Once we are done with that, it will be time for a last call to the various xml-related projects to see what we should do with the existing xml web properties (DTDs and other resources), then we will be able to fold the XML project altogether. No other issues requiring board attention at this time. -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
+1 to boxing Xindice into the Attic. The code is still available, so if a healthy and diverse community does appear we can always incubate a new project for it. - Shane On 8/12/2011 1:23 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > Further to lack of volunteering on the headsup given to the XIndice > mailing lists (http://s.apache.org/xindice-attic-thread), and with two > existing committers in agreement on moving the project to the Attic, > here is an official vote to make it happen. > > This vote will be open for 72 hours from now. Everyone is welcome to > chime in, but the only binding votes will be from the XML PMC members, > and I'm asking to keep the XIndice mailing list in the loop. > > Please cast your vote as follows: > > [+1] Move XIndice to the Attic > > [ 0] I don't really care > > [-1] No, don't move it to the Attic and I volunteer to find an > alternate solution > > > Here is my +1. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
0 I don't mind spending some time on Xindice if it is decided to keep the project active. Thanks, Natalia On Aug 12, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > Further to lack of volunteering on the headsup given to the XIndice > mailing lists (http://s.apache.org/xindice-attic-thread), and with two > existing committers in agreement on moving the project to the Attic, > here is an official vote to make it happen. > > This vote will be open for 72 hours from now. Everyone is welcome to > chime in, but the only binding votes will be from the XML PMC members, > and I'm asking to keep the XIndice mailing list in the loop. > > Please cast your vote as follows: > > [+1] Move XIndice to the Attic > > [ 0] I don't really care > > [-1] No, don't move it to the Attic and I volunteer to find an > alternate solution > > > Here is my +1. > > -- > Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it > Blog: http://boldlyopen.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
+1 -----Original Message----- From: gianugo@gmail.com [mailto:gianugo@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Gianugo Rabellino Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:24 PM To: private@xml.apache.org Cc: xindice-dev@xml.apache.org; xindice-users@xml.apache.org; general@xml.apache.org; general@attic.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Move XIndice to the Attic Further to lack of volunteering on the headsup given to the XIndice mailing lists (http://s.apache.org/xindice-attic-thread), and with two existing committers in agreement on moving the project to the Attic, here is an official vote to make it happen. This vote will be open for 72 hours from now. Everyone is welcome to chime in, but the only binding votes will be from the XML PMC members, and I'm asking to keep the XIndice mailing list in the loop. Please cast your vote as follows: [+1] Move XIndice to the Attic [ 0] I don't really care [-1] No, don't move it to the Attic and I volunteer to find an alternate solution Here is my +1. -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com Confidentiality: This transmission, including any attachments, is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). This transmission may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The use or disclosure of the information contained in this transmission, including any attachments, for any purpose other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited. Unauthorized interception of this email is a violation of federal criminal law. If you are not an intended recipient of this transmission, please immediately destroy all copies received and notify the sender. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
+1 Gareth On 12 Aug 2011, at 18:23, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > Further to lack of volunteering on the headsup given to the XIndice > mailing lists (http://s.apache.org/xindice-attic-thread), and with two > existing committers in agreement on moving the project to the Attic, > here is an official vote to make it happen. > > This vote will be open for 72 hours from now. Everyone is welcome to > chime in, but the only binding votes will be from the XML PMC members, > and I'm asking to keep the XIndice mailing list in the loop. > > Please cast your vote as follows: > > [+1] Move XIndice to the Attic > > [ 0] I don't really care > > [-1] No, don't move it to the Attic and I volunteer to find an > alternate solution > > > Here is my +1. > > -- > Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it > Blog: http://boldlyopen.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: private-help@xml.apache.org > > -- Gareth Reakes, CTO WE7 - Great Music, Free +44-20-7117-0809 http://www.we7.com “The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side. “ - Hunter S. Thompson
Further to lack of volunteering on the headsup given to the XIndice mailing lists (http://s.apache.org/xindice-attic-thread), and with two existing committers in agreement on moving the project to the Attic, here is an official vote to make it happen. This vote will be open for 72 hours from now. Everyone is welcome to chime in, but the only binding votes will be from the XML PMC members, and I'm asking to keep the XIndice mailing list in the loop. Please cast your vote as follows: [+1] Move XIndice to the Attic [ 0] I don't really care [-1] No, don't move it to the Attic and I volunteer to find an alternate solution Here is my +1. -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
There is not much user or developer activity to justify making Xindice a top-level project. Unless there are Xindice users that are interested in the future of the project I would vote for the Attic. Regards, Natalia On Aug 10, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > Anyone? In a couple of days, unless I hear otherwise, I will propose a > resolution to the XML PMC to move XIndice to the Attic, so speak now > or forever hold your peace. :) > > -- > Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it > Blog: http://boldlyopen.com > > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Gianugo Rabellino <gianugo@apache.org> wrote: >> All, >> >> this is an important message for the XIndice community: as some of you >> may have noticed, the Apache XML project has been in a "winding down" >> mode for a while, with most projects either moving to top level >> (xerces.apache.org, xalan.apache.org) or to the Attic (AxKit, >> Crimson). XIndice is now the only project left, and it's time to >> discuss about the project's future. There are two ways forward: the >> top level project route (creating xindice.apache.org with its own PMC) >> or, if the project isn't active enough to create a PMC, the Attic (see >> http://attic.apache.org). >> >> The XML project has no opinion on either, but know that if the XIndice >> community doesn't step up to own the project, the only choice left >> will be the Attic. Which, by the way, means hibernation not death: the >> software remains available both in binaries and source code (although >> in strict read-only mode), forks remain possible and projects can exit >> the Attic at any time, although to do that they need to prove they >> have a viable community standing behind them. >> >> This is a message to get the discussion going: if you want to keep >> XIndice as a full-fledged Apache project, this is your turn to step >> up! If you feel you want to help, participate, contribute and use >> XIndice, we would be glad to hear from you and, as the XML PMC, more >> than willing to hand XIndice over to a newly formed TLP. Personally, >> I'm happy to help with either transitions, be it to a TLP or to the >> Attic. Given that the project has been inactive in the past, I'm >> planning to wait for a week to see if a discussion gets going: if >> that's not the case, my plan is to start a vote in the XML PMC to >> retire XIndice to the Attic. >> >> Looking forward to your suggestions, >> >> -- >> Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it >> Blog: http://boldlyopen.com >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
I haven't been doing any Xindice - or Java - in a good while, so unless anyone else wants to step up, Attic it is. Vadim On Aug 10, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > Anyone? In a couple of days, unless I hear otherwise, I will propose a > resolution to the XML PMC to move XIndice to the Attic, so speak now > or forever hold your peace. :) > > -- > Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it > Blog: http://boldlyopen.com > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Gianugo Rabellino <gianugo@apache.org> wrote: >> All, >> >> this is an important message for the XIndice community: as some of you >> may have noticed, the Apache XML project has been in a "winding down" >> mode for a while, with most projects either moving to top level >> (xerces.apache.org, xalan.apache.org) or to the Attic (AxKit, >> Crimson). XIndice is now the only project left, and it's time to >> discuss about the project's future. There are two ways forward: the >> top level project route (creating xindice.apache.org with its own PMC) >> or, if the project isn't active enough to create a PMC, the Attic (see >> http://attic.apache.org). >> >> The XML project has no opinion on either, but know that if the XIndice >> community doesn't step up to own the project, the only choice left >> will be the Attic. Which, by the way, means hibernation not death: the >> software remains available both in binaries and source code (although >> in strict read-only mode), forks remain possible and projects can exit >> the Attic at any time, although to do that they need to prove they >> have a viable community standing behind them. >> >> This is a message to get the discussion going: if you want to keep >> XIndice as a full-fledged Apache project, this is your turn to step >> up! If you feel you want to help, participate, contribute and use >> XIndice, we would be glad to hear from you and, as the XML PMC, more >> than willing to hand XIndice over to a newly formed TLP. Personally, >> I'm happy to help with either transitions, be it to a TLP or to the >> Attic. Given that the project has been inactive in the past, I'm >> planning to wait for a week to see if a discussion gets going: if >> that's not the case, my plan is to start a vote in the XML PMC to >> retire XIndice to the Attic. >> >> Looking forward to your suggestions, >> >> -- >> Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it >> Blog: http://boldlyopen.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Matt Blaney Infrastructure Metrics, IT Operations Global Technical Application Management (313) 323-6748 (w) ________________________________ From: ravikanth@gmail.com [mailto:ravikanth@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 3:09 PM To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: unsubscribe unsubscribe
unsubscribe
Anyone? In a couple of days, unless I hear otherwise, I will propose a resolution to the XML PMC to move XIndice to the Attic, so speak now or forever hold your peace. :) -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Gianugo Rabellino <gianugo@apache.org> wrote: > All, > > this is an important message for the XIndice community: as some of you > may have noticed, the Apache XML project has been in a "winding down" > mode for a while, with most projects either moving to top level > (xerces.apache.org, xalan.apache.org) or to the Attic (AxKit, > Crimson). XIndice is now the only project left, and it's time to > discuss about the project's future. There are two ways forward: the > top level project route (creating xindice.apache.org with its own PMC) > or, if the project isn't active enough to create a PMC, the Attic (see > http://attic.apache.org). > > The XML project has no opinion on either, but know that if the XIndice > community doesn't step up to own the project, the only choice left > will be the Attic. Which, by the way, means hibernation not death: the > software remains available both in binaries and source code (although > in strict read-only mode), forks remain possible and projects can exit > the Attic at any time, although to do that they need to prove they > have a viable community standing behind them. > > This is a message to get the discussion going: if you want to keep > XIndice as a full-fledged Apache project, this is your turn to step > up! If you feel you want to help, participate, contribute and use > XIndice, we would be glad to hear from you and, as the XML PMC, more > than willing to hand XIndice over to a newly formed TLP. Personally, > I'm happy to help with either transitions, be it to a TLP or to the > Attic. Given that the project has been inactive in the past, I'm > planning to wait for a week to see if a discussion gets going: if > that's not the case, my plan is to start a vote in the XML PMC to > retire XIndice to the Attic. > > Looking forward to your suggestions, > > -- > Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it > Blog: http://boldlyopen.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Fair enough, although this is solving one problem (finding a place to host it), but doesn't solve the issue of the project itself being a prime candidate for the Attic anyways as there has been no releases or discussions or commits (modulo a handful of questions on the user list) for a long while. -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Glen Mazza <glen.mazza@gmail.com> wrote: > I see a third option -- just moving it under http://db.apache.org/. > > Glen > > On 08/04/2011 06:14 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: >> >> All, >> >> this is an important message for the XIndice community: as some of you >> may have noticed, the Apache XML project has been in a "winding down" >> mode for a while, with most projects either moving to top level >> (xerces.apache.org, xalan.apache.org) or to the Attic (AxKit, >> Crimson). XIndice is now the only project left, and it's time to >> discuss about the project's future. There are two ways forward: the >> top level project route (creating xindice.apache.org with its own PMC) >> or, if the project isn't active enough to create a PMC, the Attic (see >> http://attic.apache.org). >> >> The XML project has no opinion on either, but know that if the XIndice >> community doesn't step up to own the project, the only choice left >> will be the Attic. Which, by the way, means hibernation not death: the >> software remains available both in binaries and source code (although >> in strict read-only mode), forks remain possible and projects can exit >> the Attic at any time, although to do that they need to prove they >> have a viable community standing behind them. >> >> This is a message to get the discussion going: if you want to keep >> XIndice as a full-fledged Apache project, this is your turn to step >> up! If you feel you want to help, participate, contribute and use >> XIndice, we would be glad to hear from you and, as the XML PMC, more >> than willing to hand XIndice over to a newly formed TLP. Personally, >> I'm happy to help with either transitions, be it to a TLP or to the >> Attic. Given that the project has been inactive in the past, I'm >> planning to wait for a week to see if a discussion gets going: if >> that's not the case, my plan is to start a vote in the XML PMC to >> retire XIndice to the Attic. >> >> Looking forward to your suggestions, >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
I see a third option -- just moving it under http://db.apache.org/. Glen On 08/04/2011 06:14 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > All, > > this is an important message for the XIndice community: as some of you > may have noticed, the Apache XML project has been in a "winding down" > mode for a while, with most projects either moving to top level > (xerces.apache.org, xalan.apache.org) or to the Attic (AxKit, > Crimson). XIndice is now the only project left, and it's time to > discuss about the project's future. There are two ways forward: the > top level project route (creating xindice.apache.org with its own PMC) > or, if the project isn't active enough to create a PMC, the Attic (see > http://attic.apache.org). > > The XML project has no opinion on either, but know that if the XIndice > community doesn't step up to own the project, the only choice left > will be the Attic. Which, by the way, means hibernation not death: the > software remains available both in binaries and source code (although > in strict read-only mode), forks remain possible and projects can exit > the Attic at any time, although to do that they need to prove they > have a viable community standing behind them. > > This is a message to get the discussion going: if you want to keep > XIndice as a full-fledged Apache project, this is your turn to step > up! If you feel you want to help, participate, contribute and use > XIndice, we would be glad to hear from you and, as the XML PMC, more > than willing to hand XIndice over to a newly formed TLP. Personally, > I'm happy to help with either transitions, be it to a TLP or to the > Attic. Given that the project has been inactive in the past, I'm > planning to wait for a week to see if a discussion gets going: if > that's not the case, my plan is to start a vote in the XML PMC to > retire XIndice to the Attic. > > Looking forward to your suggestions, > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
All, this is an important message for the XIndice community: as some of you may have noticed, the Apache XML project has been in a "winding down" mode for a while, with most projects either moving to top level (xerces.apache.org, xalan.apache.org) or to the Attic (AxKit, Crimson). XIndice is now the only project left, and it's time to discuss about the project's future. There are two ways forward: the top level project route (creating xindice.apache.org with its own PMC) or, if the project isn't active enough to create a PMC, the Attic (see http://attic.apache.org). The XML project has no opinion on either, but know that if the XIndice community doesn't step up to own the project, the only choice left will be the Attic. Which, by the way, means hibernation not death: the software remains available both in binaries and source code (although in strict read-only mode), forks remain possible and projects can exit the Attic at any time, although to do that they need to prove they have a viable community standing behind them. This is a message to get the discussion going: if you want to keep XIndice as a full-fledged Apache project, this is your turn to step up! If you feel you want to help, participate, contribute and use XIndice, we would be glad to hear from you and, as the XML PMC, more than willing to hand XIndice over to a newly formed TLP. Personally, I'm happy to help with either transitions, be it to a TLP or to the Attic. Given that the project has been inactive in the past, I'm planning to wait for a week to see if a discussion gets going: if that's not the case, my plan is to start a vote in the XML PMC to retire XIndice to the Attic. Looking forward to your suggestions, -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
No issues requiring board attention, other than the fact there are no issues and no activity at all in the XML project. It's probably time we ask (what's left of) the XIndice community what they want to do with their project, and move the XML umbrella to the Attic. Will try and find cycles before the next report to make it happen and/or find closure. -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
You are very right Torsten! The first thing I'll do is to copy the definition file and to host it by myself. I did not know that our webservices depend on this file - up to now ;-) Maybe anybody has a copy of the definition file????? -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Torsten Curdt [mailto:tcurdt@vafer.org] Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. April 2011 10:23 An: general@xml.apache.org Cc: Patrick Moldenhauer Betreff: Re: XML-Soap Namespace Definition DOWN Your services depends on an external resource??? You might want to fix that instead ;) On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:57, Patrick Moldenhauer <pmoldenhauer@hans-natur.de> wrote: > Dear Mailing-List, > > > > I want to inform you guys that the XML-Soap Namespace Definition File > http://xml.apache.org/xml-soap seems to be offline. Now many of our > Webservices dont work anymore. Is anybody working on that issue? Can > I do anything? > > > > Sincerly, > > Patrick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Have you tried catalogs? paul Le 5 avr. 2011 à 09:57, Patrick Moldenhauer a écrit : > Dear Mailing-List, > > I want to inform you guys that the XML-Soap Namespace Definition File http://xml.apache.org/xml-soap seems to be offline. Now many of our Webservices don’t work anymore. Is anybody working on that issue? Can I do anything? > > Sincerly, > Patrick > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Your services depends on an external resource??? You might want to fix that instead ;) On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:57, Patrick Moldenhauer <pmoldenhauer@hans-natur.de> wrote: > Dear Mailing-List, > > > > I want to inform you guys that the XML-Soap Namespace Definition File > http://xml.apache.org/xml-soap seems to be offline. Now many of our > Webservices don’t work anymore. Is anybody working on that issue? Can I do > anything? > > > > Sincerly, > > Patrick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Dear Mailing-List, I want to inform you guys that the XML-Soap Namespace Definition File http://xml.apache.org/xml-soap seems to be offline. Now many of our Webservices don't work anymore. Is anybody working on that issue? Can I do anything? Sincerly, Patrick