Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
In-Reply-To: 
 <OF3A5CF7B1.4202F3B1-ON85256FDB.0072CB03-85256FDB.0075A7F6@ca.ibm.com>
References: 
 <OF3A5CF7B1.4202F3B1-ON85256FDB.0072CB03-85256FDB.0075A7F6@ca.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <0685E308-A6E3-11D9-8583-000A95D41A40@apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org,
 general@xml.apache.org
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <geirm@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:29:58 -0400
To: Brian Minchau <minchau@ca.ibm.com>


On Apr 6, 2005, at 5:25 PM, Brian Minchau wrote:

> My understanding is that Sun is signing a CCLA for their contribution 
> of
> JAXP 1.3.

yes.  it's really a software grant, in effect.

>
> I presume that like any code, the JAXP 1.3 code will have bugs, and 
> will
> develop over time, and will need fixes by someone. In the short term 
> that
> would most likely be Sun employees.  As a Xalan PMC member it is my
> responsibility to verify the pedigree of contributions before accepting
> changes into the code base.
>
> Are individual people listed in the CCLA that Sun is signing?

No.

> If so, then
> how can I find out who is listed, so that I can feel more confident 
> about
> accepting further contributions. Looking at
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt I don't think that
> individuals are listed.

yes, there's a bit of a mess there (need to fix the site).  Sun signed 
the same CCLA that IBM signed for Derby, which is a CCLA and 
simultaneous grant.  So they are using it for the grant part.

>
>   Also, in the past there seems to be some code that was contributed to
> Apache by Sun employees who were committers, but who have never signed 
> a
> CLA. I think that at that time CCLAs did not exist. So I find the 
> phrase in
> the CCLA most interesting:
>    "Your "Contributions" means all of your past, present and future
> contributions ..."
>
>> From reading that CCLA form it looks like all past, present and future
> contributions of all Sun employees have their licensing rights given 
> to the
> ASF, unless the contributions were donated with "Not a contribution" or
> some other conspicuous, but similar phrase.  If this is true then I 
> feel
> better about past contributions by people who were Sun employees at 
> that
> time, and who have never signed a CLA.

There are no people listed.  I'll be happy to fax you a copy if that 
helps.  IBM legal has the document - it's the same that they used for 
Derby and the recent JSR-105 contribution.

geir

>
>
> - Brian
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Brian Minchau
> Apache Xalan PMC Member
> e-mail:        minchau@ca.ibm.com
>
>
>
>
>              Shane Curcuru
>              <shane_curcuru@ya
>              hoo.com>                                                  
>  To
>                                        general@xml.apache.org
>              03/31/2005 12:18                                          
>  cc
>              PM                        xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org,
>                                        general@incubator.apache.org,
>                                        Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart
>              Please respond to         
> <Eduardo.Pelegrillopart@Sun.COM>,
>                   general              Jeff Suttor 
> <Jeff.Suttor@Sun.COM>,
>                                        xalan-dev@xml.apache.org,
>                                        commons-dev@xml.apache.org,
>                                        Suresh.K@Sun.COM
>                                                                    
> Subject
>                                        Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 
> Sources to
>                                        Apache
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Excellent news!  Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the ball on
> this one.
>
> Note: once the papers are in the Hallowed Halls, I presume that Neeraj
> will get some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and xerces-j-dev 
> as
> to how to actually check this in?  I'm presuming you have someone with
> commit access to xml-commons, which is the pre-existing home for JAXP.
> (Although incubator should check the legal issues, I don't think the
> code needs to checkin thru there).
>
> But I know Xerces and Xalan may have specific dependencies on
> xml-commons code, so we probably need to branch to allow current
> versions to work as-is and let them plan new versions with 1.3 support.
>
> - Shane
>
> Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
>> xml-common, xerces & xalan communities,
>>
>> I have learnt that legal issues regarding donation has been resolved 
>> and
>> latest version of CCLA has been signed.
>> So would like to make the actual code grant of JAXP 1.3 APIs +
>> implementation ASAP. I will start the preparation
>> today and will be back with actual code grant with in 2 days.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> - Neeraj
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
>
>
-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org