xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremias Maerki <dev.jerem...@greenmail.ch>
Subject Re: XML Graphics: draft charter, draft resolution update, items to discuss
Date Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:11:10 GMT
> TODO Sort this out! Jeremias, what problems in particular concern you here?

It's about the question I posted earlier:
On 27.06.2004 15:28:02 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Question number two is about commit rights. I guess we will keep a
> separate set of committers for Batik and FOP and will create a common
> space available to all committers when it comes to developing joint
> components (like the PDF and PS transcoders). Is everybody ok with this
> or should we discuss merging the set of committers the same way that the
> Xerces draft outlines (see [4], chapter 8.2)?

I took the Xerces draft and modified it. Chapter 8.2 basically says
right now that all FOP committers will get write access (technically,
AVAIL-File) to the Batik code repository and vice versa. But they are
only allowed to modify code from (sub)projects where they are elected
committers. Take Jakarta Commons. I'm a JC committer and can
(theoretically) modify the whole of the respository but am only allowed
to modify the "io" part of it. My big problem is finding a good
formulation of this part.

BTW, thanks for improving my mission description. That's where my
English usually reaches its limits. I'm not very good at things like

I'll try to help address the questions you raised soon. You made good

On 28.06.2004 05:03:38 Peter B. West wrote:
> I've suggested some changes on the charter wiki.  They do not take 
> account of Cliff's recent suggestion.
> > [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?XMLProjectPages/XMLGraphicsPMCDraftCharter

Jeremias Maerki

To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message