xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clay Leeds <cle...@medata.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Project resolution for XML Graphics
Date Fri, 02 Jul 2004 15:18:14 GMT
Hash: SHA1

On Jul 2, 2004, at 4:31 AM, Thomas DeWeese wrote:
> Hi all,
>    So this vote is dead right?
>    My understanding is that one '-1' and unless there are
> really exceptional circumstances it doesn't pass.
>    I would suggest that we just drop the "controversial"
> clause, with the understanding that it's intent is still
> covered by the fact that the PMC is responsible for the
> "creation and maintenance of software for managing the
> conversion of XML formats to graphical output, and for
> related software components [...]."

That appears to be what Glen indicated:

On Jul 1, 2004, at 8:38 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
> Only problem with it, preventing me from voting +1:
> I would like this clause removed:
>> RESOLVED, that the initial XML Graphics PMC be and
>> hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Batik 
>> and
>> FOP Apache XML subprojects; and be it further

As Peter indicated, however, *migration* seems to be what the whole 
purpose of this exercise is.

On Jul 2, 2004, at 7:23 AM, Peter B. West wrote:
> Would it be OK then, to just drop the "and rationalization" from the 
> resolution?
> Peter


And once the process of moving to XML Graphics PMC is complete, the 
discussion about how to rationalize (if that is going to happen) can 
continue to be discussed and hopefully be resolved.

IMO, one added benefit of migration to XML Graphics PMC, might be that 
Batik and FOP committers be more closely linked, and can more quickly 
come to agreement on these issues.

Web Maestro Clay
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)


To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message