Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86418 invoked from network); 4 May 2004 21:38:28 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2004 21:38:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 58036 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2004 21:38:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 57988 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2004 21:38:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 57924 invoked from network); 4 May 2004 21:38:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk) (195.188.213.7) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2004 21:38:06 -0000 Received: from [10.0.0.2] ([82.38.65.173]) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Tue, 4 May 2004 22:38:14 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) In-Reply-To: <4097DC75.8050505@cyberneko.net> References: <406D0E67.3090003@apache.org> <408A5294.1040108@wingsofhermes.org> <40968466.8070307@apache.org> <40977BCE.9060302@wingsofhermes.org> <4097DC75.8050505@cyberneko.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <5475F16A-9E13-11D8-ABE2-003065DC754C@blueyonder.co.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: robert burrell donkin Subject: Re: [VOTE]: motion to transform Xerces into a top-level project as a member of the "federation" of XML projects Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 22:38:06 +0100 To: general@xml.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2004 21:38:15.0019 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B37A3B0:01C43220] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 4 May 2004, at 19:09, Andy Clark wrote: > Berin Lautenbach wrote: >> You'll have to pardon me here - what were the exact issues you had >> with the charter? I think there was a piece around top level code >> base? > > Very simply: the draft charter defined Xerces sub-projects > as parser implementations in different languages. And it had > no allowance for sub-projects for a particular parser impl. > > I don't see any problem with have a PMC that deals with all > Xerces implementations but still considering the different > implementations "projects" with their own sub-projects. For > example, Xerces-J could have an HTML sub-project with the > HTML DOM implementation and an HTML parser built from the > Xerces framework. But the draft charter was explicit about > defining a sub-project as an XML parser implementation in a > particular language. IMHO sub-projects are at the root of most of the difficulties over in jakarta-land. it's much better to have a single community (corresponding to a sub-project) with several products (for example the different parser implementations) than many sub-projects. there might be parts of each community that focus most on different products but sharing the same infrastructure help ideas to be exchanged and potential problems picked up early. (jakarta commons has a score or more of products but the single community model has helped to make it a real success.) - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org