xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Neil Graham <ne...@ca.ibm.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE]: motion to transform Xerces into a top-level project as a member of the "federation" of XML projects
Date Fri, 21 May 2004 18:27:38 GMT





Hi Andy and all,

I've now rolled some of the points that we seem to have consensus on into
the original charter I suggested back at the beginning of April.  I've
posted it on the Wiki page [*] where Berin had kindly placed his reworking
of that document.

I'm also attaching a diff of my original suggestion to the modified one, in
case that makes review easier for people:  (See attached file:
charter-changes.txt)


If we can get agreement on that, then I for one would be cool for actually
voting on the resolution Berin drafted for us (which I've included below,
with a few modifications, chief among them an attempt at specifying the
composition of the PMC based on who it seems to me are the active
committers these days).  I haven't tried to fill in the field for PMC Chair
though.  :)

As always, feedback more than appreciated!

Cheers,
Neil
[*]:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?XMLProjectPages/XercesCharterDiscussion


************* Draft Motion on Xerces **************
  WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in
  the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with
  the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
  Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
  open-source software related to XML parsers, for distribution
  at no charge to the public.

  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
  Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Xerces PMC", be and
  hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation;
  and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the Xerces PMC be and hereby is responsible
  for the creation and maintenance of open-source software related
  to XML parsing and closely related technologies based on
  software licensed to the Foundation; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Xerces" be and
  hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve
  at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the
  Xerces PMC, and to have primary responsibility for management
  of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the
  Xerces PMC; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby
  are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Xerces PMC:

  * Neeraj Bajaj <neeraj@apache.org>
  * James Berry <jberry@apache.org>
  * Andy Clark <andyc@apache.org>
  * Sandy Gao <sandygao@apache.org>
  * Michael Glavassevich <mrglavas@apache.org>
  * Neil Graham <neilg@apache.org>
  * Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kohsuke@apache.org>
  * Elena Litani <elena@apache.org>
  * Alberto Massari <amassari@apache.org>
  * Khaled Noaman <knoaman@apache.org>
  * K.Venugopal Rao <venu@apache.org>
  * Gareth Reakes <gareth@apache.org>
  * Jason Stewart <jasons@apache.org>
  * PeiYong Zhang <peiyongz@apache.org>

  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that REPLACE WITH CHAIR
  be and hereby is appointed to the office of Vice President, Xerces,
  to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
  Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death,
  resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a
  successor is appointed; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the initial Xerces PMC be and hereby is tasked
  with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open
  development and increased participation in the Xerces Project;
  and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the initial Xerces PMC be and hereby is tasked
  with the migration and rationalization of the Apache XML PMC
  Xerces subproject; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the XML
  Xerces sub-project and encumbered upon the Apache XML PMC
  are hereafter discharged.




Neil Graham
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone:  905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail:  neilg@ca.ibm.com




                                                                                         
                                             
                      Andy Clark                                                         
                                             
                      <andy@cyberneko.n        To:       xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org  
                                                
                      et>                      cc:       pmc@xml.apache.org, general@xml.apache.org,
xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org       
                                               Subject:  Re: [VOTE]:  motion to transform
Xerces into a top-level project as a member  
                      05/12/2004 01:44          of the "federation" of XML projects      
                                             
                      PM                                                                 
                                             
                      Please respond to                                                  
                                             
                      pmc                                                                
                                             
                                                                                         
                                             
                                                                                         
                                             



Neil Graham wrote:
>>So "Xerces" would be the project whereas "Xerces-J" would
>>be a product release of Xerces in Java. An example sub-project
>>would be "HTML" which, again, would have products based on the
>>implementation language. They would be bundled together for
>>organizational reasons, not for releases.
>
> Conceptually, the only difficulty I'd have with this is that it's no
longer
> crystal clear what the commonality between the subprojects is.  I'd
thought

It's not clear to *you*, is what you mean. It's perfectly clear
to me. ;)

> that the "Xerces" TLP would be all about Apache's offerings related
> specifically to XML parsing first, and perhaps very closely related
> technologies second.

That sounds exactly like what I'm proposing through my use of
the terms "project" and "sub-project". Parsing is the project
and things related to parsing are sub-projects. Products is
the way that the implementations are separated from each other
within the project.

So someone comes to the website looking for XML parsers and
they go the the Xerces Project. Then they decide what language
they need, Java, so they download the Xerces-J product. Next,
they want to be able to parse HTML, so they look at the Xerces
HTML sub-project. There they see that there is an implementation
in Java for use with the XML parser they just downloaded.

In this situation, of course there are things that need to be
broken out of Xerces-J as it stands today. But once that is
done, they are each developed and packaged separately. It's
primarily the website organization that reflects the hierarchy
and relationships between these separate things.

>>I'm specifically trying to organize the Xerces TLP so that
>>I can formally donate NekoHTML to the Xerces project for the
>>Xerces-J product.
>
> I'd been guessing that.  :)

I'm asked on a regular basis if/when it will be merged into
Xerces-J so this is a perfect opportunity to do that.

>     * project:     the top level project (TLP), charged with XML parsing
> and closely allied technologies
>     * sub-project: either
>             o an XML parser implementation in a particular language, or
>             o a "tools" subproject containing useful products that are
> tightly bound, usually by nonstandard API's, to one of the other
> subprojects

But this puts dependent products at the same level as the
parser. You would think they would be *under* the parser
because of the dependency.

> The tools subproject could contain products from as many languages as
there
> were parsers.  I'm also fine with removing the restriction that we have
one
> parser per language; we may want a Xerces-J-Pull at some point.

Well, that was certainly one of my biggest problems with the
original draft.

> Once again, I'd love to call on other folks from Xerces-land.  Andy and I
> are having a good time talking among ourselves, but it's tough to gauge
the
> consensus of a community when you only ever hear two voices...

It does seem rather quiet around here. I'm surprised that
noone else has added their ideas to the discussion. Perhaps
they're scared of me. ;)

--
Andy Clark * andyc@apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: pmc-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: pmc-help@xml.apache.org



Mime
View raw message