Cliff,

You are absolutely correct - slip of the fingers.  The date is 1 March 2004.

I suppose I'd like us to be a little proactive.  If we can get everyone 
to have their CVS moved over to the new license by March (whether or not 
they have done a release), then we know that whenever a release does 
happen for any code base, we will be OK.

(Maybe I just like to nag :>)

Cheers,
	Berin


Cliff Schmidt wrote:

> Berin Lautenbach wrote on Friday, February 06, 2004 4:05 PM:
> 
> 
>>I am hoping something will come out on community@ in the next few
>>days, but this is a reminder that there is an expectation by the
>>board that we will have converted all active code-bases in xml to the
>>new 2.0 license by the end of March.
> 
> 
> Berin,
> 
> I believe the deadline is actually the beginning of March (unless
> there's a special deadline for the xml project).  I've seen a post 
> from Greg referring to March 1st.  I've also seen other posts that 
> have clarified that this really means any release from March 1st 
> onward must use the new license.  So, if you weren't going to do a 
> release until April, I guess you could have the rest of March to 
> take care of everything; although it's obviously best to just get
> this done as early as possible.  The license is a big improvement,
> IMHO (although I'm sure many of us will miss the much shorter one, 
> but at least you only need the copyright statement and reference
> to the license in each source file:
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#apply)
> 
> 
> Cliff
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
> 
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org