Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 8165 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2003 23:05:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 8092 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2003 23:05:39 -0000 Message-ID: <3EDFCCC8.4050100@sauria.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 16:05:44 -0700 From: Ted Leung User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: A cut at update to charter.txt References: <3EDF2C31.1050001@ozemail.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3EDF2C31.1050001@ozemail.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Berin Lautenbach wrote: > Peoples, > > As requested, have checked in a first cut (stake in the ground) update > to the charter to try to encompass the PMC structure and election > process. I have been a bit vague in a few areas (e.g. how to vote in > Chair) as I am not sure of the details. Have also tried to > incorporate in David Marston's comments from this morning. > > On another note - a very quick question (from a person with no legal > background whatsoever, but who read the bylaws in an effort to ensure > the charter was correct) ... > > Section 6.3 of the bylaws discusses the PMC and the members of the > PMC. To quote : > > "....Project Management Committees consisting of at least one officer > of the corporation, who shall be designated chairman of such > committee, and may include one or more other _members of the > corporation_...." > > (My emphasis) > > As I understand it we get past the PMC Chair being an officer by > recommending that person to the Board, who appoints her/him as said > officer. > > But my reading of the above is that all members of the PMC must be > members of the corporation. I know I'm not, so are we correct in what > we are doing, or is there something else of which I am not aware? My reading is that PMC's *may* include one more other members, but are not required to. > And, going one step further, doesn't it make sense to ensure (at the > very least) that a Chairperson is a formal member of the foundation? I was chair for a year before becoming a member. Speaking of which, does any body have any nominations for a new chair? Ted --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org