Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 4055 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2002 12:54:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 4039 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 12:54:02 -0000 Message-ID: <3DEDFA92.4020606@apache.org> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 13:52:34 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@xml.apache.org CC: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: The organization of xml.apache.org References: <014801c29a47$8371e430$0a00a8c0@boo> <20021203123633.GD3501@expresso.localdomain> <018f01c29b65$bd944c10$0a00a8c0@boo> <20021204095056.GC3724@expresso.localdomain> <3DEDDE94.4000707@apache.org> <3DEDF21C.40303@outerthought.org> In-Reply-To: <3DEDF21C.40303@outerthought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N - copying incubator as a notice of RFE about the docs - Steven Noels wrote: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >> Ok, then let's not even try then, who cares, oh and while we're at it >> let's remove the PMCs, why are they needed, oh and the board too, oh >> and why Apache at all... get real, try to be constructive. If nobody >> cares, tell me what we should do to solve the problem instead of >> institutionalizing it. > > > I see this and I also see you stating that there exist 'various levels > of legal protection'. Maybe we should make those levels more explicit, for: > > * contributors (patches) > * committers > * PMC - non-Members > * PMC - Members > * Members > * Directors (VPs et al.) > * Board > > Gee - I assume many will be surprised seeing _that_ many categories > existing within the Apache community. Also, given the fact committers > might receive wide-ranging commmit rights within federations of > non-topleveled projects (e.g. the future xml.a.o), I'm convinced there > exists several superfluous levels or differences in this classification. > > And I saw Sam already mentioning his inclination to be more liberal with > this 'Member'-thing on some list/blog (don't know where anymore, > information overload ;-) IMV there are 1 contributors-committers 2 PMC members 3 members Maybe I'm oversimplifying, but it's simply that 2 and 3 will be protected by Apache, the more if what they do is done following the Apache guidelines and in the interest of Apache. IE, if you are a member but deliberately commit illegal stuff to CVS and do other things like this, I don't know how much protection you will recieve, but that's IMVHO and Personal opinion. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org