xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>
Subject evaluating pull parsing APIs [Re: [Announce] CyberNeko Tools for XNI 2002.09.06 Available]
Date Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:42:54 GMT
Andy Clark wrote:

> Now that NekoPull has been out for awhile, I'd like to
> know if people have looked at it and what they think of
> my approach to an XML pull-parsing API. There are some
> key differences between NekoPull and other APIs (e.g.
> XMLPull). The primary difference is the hierarchy of
> classes with public fields to access the document info.
> Does this work for people? Is it worthwhile to pursue
> a native implementation of this approach?
> All questions, comments, and concerns are welcome.

hi Andy,

i think that it is interesting approach however currently included
samples (counter, tracer, writer) are very simple so it is hard to
see how pull parsing is really working - in XmlPull we have
not only standard samples but also more complex ones
and that were specifically chosen to allow comparing pull parsing
with push parsing: samples are based on articles that were
describing .NET or SAX and we wanted to show that pull parsing
and particularly XmlPull API is good solution :-)
i think they should be very easy to modify for NekoPull.



first sample can also be compared to .NET code from
the original article: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/05/22/parsing.html
and its SAX version: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/03/06/csharpxml.html


second sample is aiming to show that maintaining state with pull
parser is much easier than to use SAX with switch/case in callbacks IMHO.

i believe that those two samples can be a valuable tool to compare
different APIs and i would like to hear your opinion.



In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message