xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Libbrecht <p...@activemath.org>
Subject Re: CfP: Apache JAXB Implementation Project
Date Tue, 06 Aug 2002 19:30:07 GMT
Derived classes would be the least I would expect.
They can break when changing the DTD but it still seems to be the only 
viable alternative.

Are you telling me that JAXB has no notion of factory ?
Then I'd honestly, simply throw it all by the window.
Having worked for quite a while now with a JDOM-subclassing library, 
allow me to declare that factories are ESSENTIAL !

What can be the use of having your own objects if you don't want to 
provide better accessors ?


On Mardi, août 6, 2002, at 05:06 , Jochen Wiedmann wrote:

>   - Of course it is questionable whether Java code should
>     be added to the schema. The recommended approach is
>     not using the generated classes directly, but derived
>     subclasses. This can be done by configuring the
>     factory.
> Such things are of course not proposed by JAXB. Which is
> another reason why I wouldn't want to stick with the
> official implementation.

In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message