Return-Path: 
 <general-return-6108-apmail-xml-general-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28604 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2002 13:25:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:general-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:general@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28507 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2002 13:25:08 -0000
Message-ID: <20020724132509.18085.qmail@web12108.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 06:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Shane Curcuru <shane_curcuru@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: Re: Making RefactorIT refactoring tool free for apache
To: support@refactorit.com, general@xml.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Great! Thanks for the note.

Sander/RefactorIT: yes, in my opinion you should definitely add the
javax.xml* packages, since we have apache code there and they're quite
important packages for our xml work (and some work in jakarta).  Note
that Apache has several main communities, each of which have their own
sets of mailing lists.  You might get requests later on as the other
Apache communities hear about this (jakarta and xml should now know
about it).

xml.apache.org: FYI, there has been some discussion on general@jakarta
about taking RefactorIT up on their tools offer; see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=102737834400006&r=1&w=2

- Shane

--- Refactorit Support <support@refactorit.com> wrote:
> From: "Refactorit Support" <support@refactorit.com>
> To: <shane_curcuru@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Making RefactorIT refactoring tool free for apache
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:48:16 +0300
> 
> Hi Shane,
> 
> Saw you mail in apache general list archive (am not a subscriber).
> 
> Of course the offer applies to xml & www communities also. One of the
> reasons I sent the mail to webmaster was to check if we have missed
> some package names and if so then add them. 
> 
> Currently we have used these package names:
> 
> org.apache*
> org.w3c*
> org.xml*
> 
> Does this work for your projects? Should we add something? You
> mentioned 'javax.xml*' - we have no problem adding this if nessecary.
> 
> best regards,
> Sander M�gi
> --
> RefactorIT team
> 
> 
> >Does anyone know if this offer applies to the xml or www communities
> >@apache.org as well?
> >
> >Also, depending on how you look at it, org.apache.* is really the
> only
> >ASF package.  Although an argument could be made for the javax.xml.*
> >packages, since though Sun 'runs' the JCP specifications, Apache has
> >it's own implementation classes there.
> >
> >The xml.apache.org project happens to redistribute the org.xml.sax*
> and
> >org.w3c.dom* stuff as part of the xml-commons subproject (and a
> number
> >of other projects, obviously), but the original owners are
> elsewhere.  
> >
> >
> >=====
> >- Shane
> 
> 


=====
- Shane

<eof .sig="'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, 
in a very scornful tone, 'it means just what I 
choose it to mean - neither more nor less'"
"Oohayu oyod?!"=gis. />

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org