From general-return-5596-apmail-xml-general-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org Thu Jan 17 13:19:27 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 87530 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2002 13:19:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 87519 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 13:19:26 -0000 Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Subject: Re: [proposal] Creation of Forrest as full subproject To: general@xml.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5 September 22, 2000 Message-ID: From: "Sam Ruby" Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:17:40 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D04NM201/04/M/IBM(Release 5.0.9 |November 16, 2001) at 01/17/2002 08:20:01 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > Now, I wonder: is 'forrest' still the right name for the two things > combined? I think of them as one thing, that's why I want them combined. If you look at the project descriptors, there are things in there that I always intended for future expansion, such as the locations of the home pages for the various projects. I know where I want to end up, and with your help (and John and perhaps others), we will end up there faster. I am neither possessive nor easily offended. If you want to use gump as the name for the combined effort, that would be fine with me. Or forrest if you prefer. Or some new name entirely is also OK with me. You pick. All I know or care about is what parts I want to work on next. ;-) - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org