xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Stricker <shu...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: Forrest (a.k.a. xml.apache.org 2.0)
Date Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:03:09 GMT
Sam Ruby wrote:
> 
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

> > Just like Gump which is not a subproject on its own, Forrest doesn't
> > deserve that status neither as long as it remains a single-man show
> > (and my experience tells me it will very likely remain so if the
> > above goals are met)
> 
> We are already up to two.  I'd like to see the build system build upon
> Gump (let me rephrase that: since I'm volunteering, the build system
> *WILL* build upon Gump).  Perhaps Gump itself didn't have enough
> technical critical mass to become a project, but perhaps Forrest+Gump
> does.

OTOH since both Gump and Forrest are doing cross-project stuff, would it
be a good idea to put them into xml-commons?

Best regards,
Martin Stricker
-- 
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message