Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 32265 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2001 09:28:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 32254 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2001 09:28:08 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: hazchem@pop3.demon.co.uk Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3BE70787.9E413E7F@apache.org> References: <3BE70787.9E413E7F@apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 00:58:48 +0000 To: general@xml.apache.org From: max@corrosive.co.uk Subject: Re: website++: some fixes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 10:41 PM +0100 11/5/01, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >Netscape 4.78 is also not resizing the image in the cell background and >is loosing a the image on top of the sitebar. > >Mozilla is messing up with the closing image on the left of the top >image. > >Hmmm, I wonder: why don't we just write a simple "rectangle" layout and >forget about fancy stuff? just an idea (please max, don't take it wrong, >I love your contribution! it's really much better than what we have!) yeah, I'm beginning to wonder myself... feedbacks have been very different so far and, although I like the design, I'm feeling we are "exposing" it to far too many variants... (...mind you, Berin's code has solved the top background image problem on my NC4.7 and still works fine on IE5.1...) I wonder what everybody else thinks about this issue? is it worth me trying out a sharp-edged version of the same design? -- ------------------------------ Max Guglielmino Corrosive http://www.corrosive.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org