Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 12920 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2001 21:56:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 12909 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2001 21:56:21 -0000 Message-ID: <003701c1670d$cd11dbe0$0501a8c0@www> From: "Pae Choi" To: , "Peter Kacandes" Cc: Subject: Re: [POLL] ebXML Reg./Rep. on Apache? Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:55:49 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This probably is better decision. I don't think any of Apache Commtters really understand what is this project about. And I do not even think any of those read the spec before. Moreover, worse is that ones do not even read the specs and think they have full qualifications for making decision. What a haughtiness! Funny thing is that ones keep saying "open" don't even understand the true concept of open. Maybe "open" in the domain of own ideology. The policies made by people and anything made by people can be changed. Otherwise, you will end up falling into own trap. However, noone is stopping if you prefer to stick to it and keep all yours in your dog house. Pae >Dear Apache XML Community Members, > >First off, I want to thank you all for your time and effort in consideration of >our project proposal. > >It seems pretty clear, however, that the requirements for gaining acceptance as >an Apache project have not been met, and for good reason. > >I fully understand and agree with the condition that there should be an active >community in place around a project. This presented a bit of a catch 22 for us >since we could not share the code base widely until we found a home for it. > >We had initially intended to start a regular open source project, but thought we >might give Apache a first crack at it because we believe that the goals of ebXML >align strongly with those of Apache and that the XML registry/repository project >in particular has a great deal of synergy with other Apache XML projects. > >I think that the best thing for us to do at this point is to get our project >started elsewhere. Depending on how it goes, then perhaps at somepoint in the >future we can revisit the issue if both communities think it advantageous. > >We will let you know as soon as the code base is available in another open >source forum. At that point, we would certainly welcome the participation of any >Apache community members, whether committers or not. > >Again, our sincere thanks for your consideration of the project. I have high >hopes that we may be able to work together on this project at some point in the >future. > >regards > >pk > >Peter Kacandes > >Sr. Product Manager, Java XML APIs phone number: 408 276 7139, X17139 >Java Software Products email: peter.kacandes@sun.com > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org