Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 89644 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2001 21:45:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 89614 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2001 21:45:06 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:49:38 -0700 (PDT) From: X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: -1 to Anakia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 Scott_Boag@lotus.com wrote: > I don't usually take a non-moveable stand on things, but at least the Xalan > project will be using Anakia over my dead, bloodied body. Nor do I think > the rest of apache should adapt it... I've had arguments Jon before about > why I think XSLT & JAXP 1.1 is better. +1 on your -1, I had the exact same position regarding tomcat - but it seems they'll still use anakia for tomcat ( over my dead, bloodied body ). > If someone pulls out the ". Anakia seems to perform much faster than > Xalan's XSL processor at creating pages. (23 pages are generated in 7-8 No, they just say XSL and docbook are "too complex", and HTML is not powerfull enough - so they had to define the DTD and a new transformation language. Soon we'll hear that HTTP1.1 is too compex and we'll have an attp protocol and server. Costin ( I just gave up on the whole issue - now I'm just trying to ignore the whole issue ) --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org