Yeh, seems pretty silly to require the documenters to have an understanding of code if any style changes are needed. -----Original Message----- From: Scott_Boag@lotus.com [mailto:Scott_Boag@lotus.com] Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 8:02 PM To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: -1 to Anakia Hi Kids. I hate to rain on the parade, but I think it would look pretty funny to use Anakia instead of XSLT for the Xalan project. Further, I think the use of JDOM in Anakia is moving the opposite direction of a high performance for dynamic transformations. I don't usually take a non-moveable stand on things, but at least the Xalan project will be using Anakia over my dead, bloodied body. Nor do I think the rest of apache should adapt it... I've had arguments Jon before about why I think XSLT & JAXP 1.1 is better. If someone pulls out the ". Anakia seems to perform much faster than Xalan's XSL processor at creating pages. (23 pages are generated in 7-8 seconds on a PIII 500mhz running Win98 and JDK 1.3 with client Hotspot. A similar system using Ant's