From general-return-4576-apmail-xml-general-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org Mon Jul 16 16:03:49 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 46953 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2001 16:03:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 46942 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2001 16:03:48 -0000 Message-ID: <20010716160349.98103.qmail@web12807.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:03:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Davanum Srinivas Reply-To: dims@yahoo.com Subject: Re: -1 to Anakia To: general@xml.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jason, In the long run am ok to using anything to do the docs and site. In the short term, let us at least stick to the Stylebook DTD's since every other project in the xml family are already in this format. When we decide to move forward, let us push all the projects to move forward. Here's one plan of action: C2-Beta2 will be out shortly (a week or so). Let us try Donald Ball's Stylesheets with C2 and see how far we can go. C2 can generate static html and it can also run as a servlet. Summarizing, Here's my -1 to move to Anakia now. Thanks, dims --- Jason van Zyl wrote: > On 7/16/01 11:31 AM, "Scott_Boag@lotus.com" wrote: > > > > >> It all boils down to a matter of preference: you probably dislike > >> the idea of using Anakia as much as I dislike XSLT. I don't think it > > matters > >> in the end as long as a project produces good documentation. > >> employed. > > > > I'm perfectly happy with this. > > > >> But I think it > >> would be fun to benchmark C2 against Anakia at producing pages. I'm > > working > >> on a compiler for Velocity (using BCEL, same tool in Xalan I believe) and > > we > >> plan to do more work on Anakia. I'd be more than happy to produce less > > vague > >> numbers. > > > > Only if it's done very carefully, and provides truly valuable and not > > misleading information to those who have to make technology decisions. > > Otherwise I certainly don't have time for this kind of thing. > > > > I totally agree with the sentiment. > > > But any benchmark work like this should be done by a more neutral party > > than either you or I. > > I don't think there is a problem with us making the benchmark package > as long as it is examined by a neutral party. > > > -scott > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org > > -- > > jvz. > > Jason van Zyl > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine > http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity > http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org > ===== Davanum Srinivas, JNI-FAQ Manager http://www.jGuru.com/faq/JNI __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org