Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 56685 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2001 18:37:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 56100 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2001 18:36:25 -0000 Message-ID: <010b01c0eac9$f697e650$0b8c2640@TINY> From: "Ted Leung" To: , , Cc: References: Subject: Re: Consolidated feedback on JDK 1.4? Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:37:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Stevens" To: ; ; Cc: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:33 AM Subject: Re: Consolidated feedback on JDK 1.4? > on 6/1/01 8:58 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote: > > > Is there value in a consolidated Apache feedback, or should I > > encourage projects to pursue the issues separately? > > I'm all for having an "Apache" response from the PMC Chair of Jakarta. > > Lets make a press release at JavaOne and point out that Sun can't even > follow their own testing compatibility suites that they want to force > everyone else (ie: the licensing issues in the JCP) to follow. :-) > > -jon > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org