xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GOMEZ Henri <hgo...@slib.fr>
Subject FW: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WA S : XML parser: old version
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:48:40 GMT
Thanks for any POSITIVE comments.

>From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:hgomez@slib.fr]
>Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:42 AM
>To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be
>put in ? : WA S : XML parser: old version
>>> I launch that poll to see if which XML parser RPMS users want to
>>> see included by default.
>>Probably no XML parser should be included. . Just document the
>>fact that
>>admin should synlink necessary jars to the tomcat lib
>>directory. IMHO it
>>is wrong idea to include parser with any java app which requires it.
>>JAXP API makes this unnecessary (definitely unless Tomcat uses some
>>special private API from crimson or xerces).
>If I didn't include a default XML parser, we'll receive just too many
>emails from new users telling about 'tomcat couldn't find XML parser'.
>The XML parser should be included in the distro since new and average
>users MAY never use XML in their apps.
>The experienced users in XML known what is JAXP, NAMESPACE, and also
>know what parser they want to be used. Note that with TC 3.3/4.0 you'll
>could use a different parser...
>The real question is what could be a reasonable choice as XML for
>Tomcat (size, functionnalities, stability...)
>I'll forward the POLL to general-xml and general-jakarta !:

In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message