From general-return-4163-apmail-xml-general-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org Thu May 03 22:44:11 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 31619 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2001 22:44:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 23389 invoked from network); 3 May 2001 22:31:50 -0000 Message-ID: <3AF1DC31.7929F9D2@cyberneko.net> Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 15:31:13 -0700 From: Andy Clark X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Validating Parsers that support XMLSchema References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2001 22:24:05.0825 (UTC) FILETIME=[C3AB9310:01C0D41F] X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Robert Nicholson wrote: > Which SAX,DOM parsers currently support validation via XMLSchema? Beware of claims that individual parsers support XMLSchema. If you dig enough through most web pages you'll find some text that reads like "we are fully compliant *except* for all the parts that we chose not to implement". ;) Xerces-J Schema limitations are clearly stated from the following web page: http://xml.apache.org/xerces-j/schema.html But it's probably a little out of date because I think Xerces-J supports a lot more now in the code in the CVS repository. -- Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * andyc@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org