Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-general-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 50184 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2001 23:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 50167 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2001 23:57:07 -0000 Message-ID: <3AD24C5C.38A02637@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:57:16 +0200 From: Martin Stricker Organization: http://martin-stricker.de/ http://www.surfo.net/ http://www.masterportal24.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.cgi X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en]C-CCK-MCD BDP81800 (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: xml.apache.org charter proposal References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Scott_Boag@lotus.com wrote: > > Arved Sandstrom wrote: > > This is not a commercial operation that has profit and deadlines as > > the bottom-line. Milestones are important, but they are also not the > > be-all and end-all. > > The rest of your arguments (which I agree with) aside, the above > statement isn't strictly true. In back of all funding that companies > donate to Apache are profit and deadlines. This shouldn't be seen as > a bad thing... but rather as positive economic force and incentive. But it might discourage private contributors because they haven't the time to keep the pace. OTOH this might thrust some to work harder because they like to compete... I don't know which one does apply more, but I definitely belong to the first... -- Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/ Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org