Return-Path: <SCoffman@COVANSYS.com>
Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53683 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2001 02:16:33 -0000
Received: from fthsmtp01.cbsinc.com (207.220.127.21)
  by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 6 Mar 2001 02:16:33 -0000
Received: by fthsmtp01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <F2KC40H8>; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:24:14 -0500
Message-ID: <F2601D65FD97D41198A700B0D03E9450540C10@hqex01>
From: COFFMAN Steven <SCoffman@COVANSYS.com>
To: "'general@xml.apache.org'" <general@xml.apache.org>
Subject: VOTE: PMC size
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:25:34 -0500 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Vote as per Scott Boag's suggestion (but without the ordinal-cardinal
category confusion):
A)  3 people.
B)  5 people.
C)  < 15 people.
D)  Project representation - 1 person for each project (which nobody seems
to like except me)

For myself, +1 to B (since PMC discussions are open to non-PMC project
representative input).