xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott_B...@lotus.com
Subject Re: Batik refs to Crimson (was Re: Volunteers: First Cut)
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2001 21:31:43 GMT

That's just a default fallback for use with SAX if no JAXP 1.1
implementation can be found and no SAX parser properties are found.  I
wouldn't think it would be a problem.


                    Edwin Goei                                                           
                    <Edwin.Goei@en        To:     general@xml.apache.org              
                    g.sun.com>            cc:     (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)         
                                          Subject:     Re: Batik refs to Crimson (was Re:
Volunteers: First Cut)    
                    03:14 PM                                                             
                    Please respond                                                       
                    to general                                                           

Scott_Boag@lotus.com wrote:
> Stephane Hillion <hillion@apache.org> wrote:
> >  BTW I used Xalan 1.2.1 in Batik to perform some XSL stuff and it was
> >  impossible to change the DOM implementation since explicit references
> >  Xerces are present everywhere. Too bad..
> XalanJ 2.0 is independent of Xerces or Crimson... it only uses JAXP 1.1,
> DOM2, and SAX2.

I don't know if it is still true, but in our current internal build we
have to replace the following file because it refers to xerces...



In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message