xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Elena Litani <hlit...@jtcsv.com>
Subject Re: Volunteers: FINAL Cut?
Date Fri, 09 Mar 2001 16:42:23 GMT
> "Sam Ruby" <rubys@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > In case I wasn't clear:
> > +1 to project representation
> > -1 to one person from each subproject

Scott_Boag@lotus.com wrote:
> I did not think we were shooting for project
> representation, but more of a dry lightweight management model, that should
> be kept as light as possible.

> If we *are* shooting for project representation, then, god damn it, make it
> fair representation.  

I agree with Scott. 5 people is a good number if we are aiming to have a
lightweight management.
However, if we really aim to have fair representation for projects - how
are we going to represent Xerces? It has 3 subprojects - so how many
people are going to represent it -- 2? 

> To be clear: my vote for '5' was not based on a project representation
> model.  I would be happy with the proposal in the above paragraph, but
> let's be specific about it and revote.

Elena [Xerces committer]

In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message