Sam Ruby wrote:
> Priorities in open source projects tend not to be determined in a top down
> fashion, but rather based on where the exist an adequate number of
> volunteers to work on a given area. If a volunteer were to show up wishing
> to replace this particular area with a more general solution, and promising
> not to perturb the overall tighter integration with Rhino in the process,
> would such a volunteer be welcome?
Of course if someone comes up with a better solution (ability to have
more scripting languages without loosing features/simplicity of use) he
will be welcome.
--
Christophe
|