xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arved Sandstrom <Arved...@chebucto.ns.ca>
Subject Re: VOTE: PMC size
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2001 23:05:23 GMT
At 11:06 AM 3/6/01 -0500, Scott_Boag@lotus.com wrote:
>Arved Sandstrom <Arved_37@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote:
>> All other functions are accommodated through the already discussed
>> of having temporary working groups. The all-committer body (standing WG)
>> identification and management of these WGs as one of its primary
>> Scott's Architectural Mgmt Council could definitely be one of these.
>The AMC concept is not one of a temporary working group, but a long term
>guidence institution.

Understood. "Temporary" means not eternal. :-) More exactly, I meant that 
"temporary" working groups would be shorter-lived than the standing group 
composed of all committers, since all special-purpose groups would be given 
their mandate by that all-committers group.


Fairly Senior Software Type
e-plicity (http://www.e-plicity.com)
Wireless * B2B * J2EE * XML --- Halifax, Nova Scotia

View raw message