Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 66109 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2001 20:39:54 -0000 Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com (205.188.157.37) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 28 Feb 2001 20:39:54 -0000 Received: from DEKellum@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id y.d4.2f1df67 (5710) for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:38:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from aol.com (mule.office.aol.com [10.2.117.129]) by air-id04.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:38:04 -0500 Sender: dekellum Message-ID: <3A9D6191.E60F0FC8@aol.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:37:37 -0500 From: David Kellum X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Differences in DTD handling between Xerces-J and Crimson References: <3A96BB53.826BEA0D@aol.com> <3A97361B.25A60E87@eng.sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Edwin Goei wrote: > Try this, in the code that starts the parse, there is a SAX InputSource > object representing the main document. Use InputSource.setSystemID() to > set some URI on the main document. I believe an empty string ("") > should work as well. HTH, Thanks! This did the trick and now I'm seeing better performance with crimson. This also doesn't hurt xerces so my code can work with either of these parsers. --David