xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Park, Sung-Gu" <jeri...@thinkfree.com>
Subject Re: regarding - The TX compatibility APIs are no longer present in the XML4J 3.0.x s
Date Wed, 22 Nov 2000 19:51:55 GMT
Hi, Jeffrey.

Can you give me a favor?    ^^;
I'd like to know how to implement or use for the TXElement's getFirstChild()
and collectNameSpaceAttributes() method, XML4J.  any other compatible easy method?

Actually, I don't have XML4J.   so, I don't know about TX at all.... 
Please, show me the way to go through TX APIs.   ^^;

P.S. : Could you please send me XML4J 3.0.x?  I counl't download it from IBM alphaworks.
         I guess I have the problem with the network traffic on the way to connect to alphaworks...
  ^^;
         (Why?   in order to analysis...  ^^;  actually, I don't want use TX APIs... ^^;)

Sung-Gu.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffrey Rodriguez" <jeffreyr_97@hotmail.com>
To: <general@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: regarding - The TX compatibility APIs are no longer present in the XML4J 3.0.x
s


> Hi Manoj,
> 
> The TX Compatibility API has never been part of Xerces, it was decided
> long time ago to discontinue support of these set of API's.
> 
> The reason that was given is that they used proprietary ( non-standard) API 
> extensions.
> 
> Since then the parser architectures (old xml4j ibm versions 2.x.x vs xml4j 
> 3.x.x ) have diverged.
> 
> Latest Xerces-j parser is Xerces 1.2.1
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
>                 Jeffrey Rodriguez
>                 XML Development
> 
> 
> >From: "manoj vk" <vkmanoj@hotmail.com>
> >Reply-To: general@xml.apache.org
> >To: xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org
> >CC: general@xml.apache.org
> >Subject: regarding - The TX compatibility APIs are no longer present in the 
> >XML4J 3.0.x s
> >Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:42:44 GMT
> >
> >i have 2 Questions...
> >1) Why The TX compatibility APIs are no longer present in the XML4J 3.0.x
> >series.is there any disadvantage or the same functionality can be acheived
> >by some other classes? what i need is a functinality where a(XML)Document
> >object be written to an output stream.what i have is a xerces1.0.3 parser.
> >
> >2) which is the latest version of xerces parser...
> >
> >thanks in advance
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> >
> >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> >http://profiles.msn.com.
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
> >
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> 
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
> http://profiles.msn.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
> 
Mime
View raw message