Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 77359 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2000 07:56:35 -0000 Received: from pluto.ubs.com (firewall-user@193.134.254.194) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2000 07:56:35 -0000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by pluto.ubs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA26048 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:56:33 +0200 (MET DST) From: harald.mueller@ubs.com Received: from unknown(160.59.228.6) by pluto via smap (V5.5) id xma026037; Tue, 10 Oct 00 09:56:31 +0200 Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by hermes2.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch (8.9.3 (PHNE_21697)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA19693 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:56:24 +0200 (METDST) X-OpenMail-Hops: 2 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:56:08 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: how fast and how stable? MIME-Version: 1.0 TO: general@xml.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline; filename="BDY.TXT" ;Creation-Date="Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:56:07 +0200" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, have someone experiance how fast and how stable xalan is by using mass flow (up to 1 Mio documents of a run). Is the Java-Version also able to handle that great load? Harald Mueller, Zuerich