Return-Path: <187@novagate.com> Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 52189 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2000 22:28:22 -0000 Received: from interop.leopard.com (HELO must.interoperate.com) (209.38.73.63) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2000 22:28:22 -0000 Received: from what.leopard.com (IDENT:inter0p@what.leopard.com [209.38.73.61]) by must.interoperate.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA29887 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:50:11 -0600 From: ok <187@novagate.com> Reply-To: 187@novagate.com To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: including Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:25:49 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain References: <39944DB3.95558726@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0008111629160C.24568@what.leopard.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N great! that works, thanks. Here are 2 additional questions. 1. Lets say part1.xml is located relative to the main XML file "including" it. For instance, I have a servlet which parses /home/root.xml root.xml "includes" /home/root/dir1/part1.xml I have noticed that the parser wants a full path to it. 2. I noticed the parser does not like recusive entity references. For example, if part1.xml below had this is it: ]> It chokes on this. On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Here is an example using the internal subset: > > > > > ]> > > &part1; > &part2; > > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - IBM Cupertino, XML Technology Group > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org