Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 62317 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2000 18:09:18 -0000 Received: from mailhub1.almaden.ibm.com (198.4.83.44) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2000 18:09:18 -0000 Received: from sun1.cupertino.ibm.com (sun1.cupertino.ibm.com [9.6.22.48]) by mailhub1.almaden.ibm.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA26878; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 11:04:26 -0700 Received: from us.ibm.com (maki.cupertino.ibm.com [9.6.22.89]) by sun1.cupertino.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA18548; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 11:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <396CB453.401D4DC7@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 11:09:23 -0700 From: Arnaud Le Hors Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@xml.apache.org CC: xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [Xerces2] Requirements list; 'Xerces2'?; cross-posting References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ed Staub wrote: > > If no one better-suited has volunteered to run the proposed requirements > list in the interim, I'll post an updated list tonight. Great! > Do we have consensus on "Xerces2" as a name? > All of the very recent mail has been in favor. > Should someone actively poll the committers? I hope nobody will want to waste any more time on looking for another name when there are so many more important issues to work on. Let's focus our energy on the requirements! > I think this discussion should probably move to(ONLY) > xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org., not general@xml.apache.org. I'm going to > start posting just on xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org. OK? I agree. -- Arnaud Le Hors - IBM Cupertino, XML Technology Group