Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 98156 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2000 23:58:03 -0000 Received: from swbcs005.sbc.com (209.184.192.25) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2000 23:58:03 -0000 Received: from swgate1.sbc.com (swgate1.sbc.com [132.201.82.89]) by swbcs005.sbc.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA03777 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:57:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: by swgate1.sbc.com (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #6 built 1997-Dec-24) id ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:57:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from msgstlhub02.sbc.com(really [132.201.87.59]) by swgate1.sbc.com via sendmail with esmtp id for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:57:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: by msgstlhub02.sbc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:57:31 -0500 Message-ID: <351FB1C90471D311BCC800508B0763690185E2BD@d072043.sbc.com> From: "HERRICK, CHUCK (SBCSI)" To: "'general@xml.apache.org'" Subject: RE: What name? Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:57:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" OK, you're wrong. Stand corrected. Xerces is not an IBM product. It's an Apache product. If you want an IBM product, go get IBM4J. It's still available at the IBM Alphaworks site. -----Original Message----- From: Edwin Goei [mailto:Edwin.Goei@eng.sun.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 6:52 PM To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: What name? "Arnaud Le Hors" writes: > Brett, > I can't believe you're dragging this back into a Sun vs IBM thing. It is > true that most comitters have been IBMers so far. But this happened > despite the fact we've been trying repeatedly to get the Sun folks to > join us. I'm assuming you're referring to me as one of the "Sun folks". As I've said previously my major objection to working on the current Xerces code is that it is in general difficult to understand. I would much rather work on a different code base such as Aelfred2 or Crimson or better, this new parser (spinnaker). I was not hired to specifically work on Xerces and so I have chosen not to. Maybe it's different for people working at IBM Cupertino that are specifically hired to work on Xerces because it is also an IBM product. I'm guessing here, correct me if I'm wrong. > Besides, Sun has made many public announcements that they > support Xerces. I don't have enough info on this. I know in the past different people in Sun have made mistakes about such announcements. Sun is a large company and sometimes the left hand doesn't always know what the right is doing. > At the same time, we've all made it very clear in many > occasions that this was not IBM's parser, nor Sun's, but Apache's. This > was stated again at the XML Apache BOF we had at JavaOne. Fine. I think we are starting to get more participation with this new parser project. I certainly would like to participate. -Edwin --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org