Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 51994 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2000 20:36:30 -0000 Received: from mercury.sun.com (192.9.25.1) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2000 20:36:30 -0000 Received: from shorter.eng.sun.com ([129.144.174.35]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA28891 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from edwinlt (d-ucup02-124-57 [129.144.124.57]) by shorter.eng.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v1.7) with SMTP id NAA11859 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <022d01bfeb77$5c061000$397c9081@eng.sun.com> From: "Edwin Goei" To: References: <009d01bfeb25$20d12d00$0a00a8c0@sauria.com> <396B5B48.C2E5A6B3@us.ibm.com> Subject: Re: Let's move on! Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:34:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 > Again, I think all this could have been avoided, easily. But forget it. Maybe this is just part of open source development :-) as evidenced by gnuemacs vs. XEmacs, gcc vs. egcs, or just Tomcat vs. Catalina. > As I've said, or tried to: we've never intended to make this project > ours, we are all for an open discussion, we are all for a rearchitecture > of the parser, and we welcome anybody to join the discussion and help on > the next version of Xerces. Great, glad to hear it. -Edwin