xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Hunter <jhun...@acm.org>
Subject Re: parser-next-gen goals, plan, and requirements
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2000 05:51:22 GMT
Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus wrote:
> > are you subsribed? It doesn't look like it!
> Yes I am.  It is a very busy list, and I don't read the mails often, I
> admit.  I did take a look at it initially, and I think I did send you
> comments.
> My statement may have been a bit strong, since I have not taken a good look
> at JDOM lately.  I would rather simply see, in the *core*, one tree model
> supported, and I personally think it should be the W3C DOM.  

My understanding of the proposal was that there would be *no* tree model
in the core.  Trees would be pluggable with, as James said, potentials
of DOM, DOM-ReadOnly, DOM-Deferred, JDOM, and FOOTREEAPI.  I'd also want
to add a JDOM-Deferred.


View raw message