Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 58731 invoked from network); 15 May 2000 22:34:43 -0000 Received: from pb143.lodz.ppp.tpnet.pl (HELO celeron.mimo.core.pl) (root@212.160.29.143) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2000 22:34:43 -0000 Received: from interdata.com.pl (IDENT:mimo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by celeron.mimo.core.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA01942 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 00:40:13 +0200 From: mimo@interdata.com.pl Sender: mimo@celeron.mimo.core.pl Message-ID: <39207CCD.910C3955@interdata.com.pl> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 00:40:13 +0200 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: SAX References: <392048E2.98AEA767@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > [...] > I haven't changed my mind, this would add implementation complexity of > both producers and consumers without adding significant functionality. No - the idea is that there is no added complexity required. Basically it's not a big deal to return a value for the event consumer if the event was consumed or not. It's also not a big deal for document producer to use this value. It's also not a big deal to create the API so not a single line has to be changed in current code. -- Mike