xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Pogue <mpo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: SAX
Date Thu, 11 May 2000 00:26:58 GMT
The xml-dev mailing list (now hosted at OASIS, I think) is the
place where SAX is discussed.  Note that it is a very high volume
mailing list!


Michal Mosiewicz wrote:
> I've sent it already to sax@megginson.com, but I thought that it might
> be worth to mention it here. I think that SAX could be much more robust,
> if it was extended a little bit, and this list could be a good place to
> discuss it.
> First, what I notice in SAX that bothers me is that it lacks for
> bidirectional communication. I.e. there is a data producer, that sends
> the whole document as events, and there is a consumer, that is only
> expected to listen for those events, and just to follow them.
> IMHO, SAX event handlers also should return some informative codes
> similiary to how it is implemented in Sun's taglibs, where tag handlers
> may return things like SKIP_BODY or SKIP_PAGE.
> All the parts of the producer-transformer-serializer path could possibly
> benefit from this:
> 1. Some content producers may send possibly more data that is needed to
> get the final document, so transformations applied may shorten the
> source content, or even get small parts of this. While this is maybe not
> so necessary in case of simple sequentially read files, it may enhance
> performance if the producer may ommit some parts - for example, if you
> wrap database data in your XML or more general - if you can access
> source document randomly.
> 2. We can optimize transformers, especially if you pipeline several
> transformations, you can backtrace the events that don't produce any
> result, and optimise the whole transformation pipeline.
> 3. There is also potentially much larger gain in serializer part,
> becouse this could allow for structure level caching of the result, i.e.
> you could potentially decide to cache some fragments of the output, not
> necessarily whole documents. Currently it's teoretically possible, but
> document producer is not able to know if it is not required to provide
> some data, becouse the cached output is still valid.
> Does anybody know if there is any mailing list related strictly to SAX?
> -- Mike
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message