Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 57324 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2000 16:55:52 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.austin.ibm.com (192.35.232.18) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2000 16:55:52 -0000 Received: from netmail3.austin.ibm.com (netmail3.austin.ibm.com [9.53.250.99]) by mailgate1.austin.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24530 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:50:26 -0500 Received: from popmail.austin.ibm.com (popmail.austin.ibm.com [9.53.247.178]) by netmail3.austin.ibm.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA40052; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:55:50 -0500 Received: from apache.org (socks2.almaden.ibm.com [9.1.40.50]) by popmail.austin.ibm.com (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7-client1.01) with ESMTP id LAA25442; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:55:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3908714F.D5863323@apache.org> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:56:47 -0700 From: Mike Pogue Organization: xml.apache.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org CC: general@jakarta.apache.org, general@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: JDOM and Thank You :) References: <27721519.956845762226.JavaMail.root@mua1.msgto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Could somebody who was there summarize how it differs from JSR031 (Java Data Binding)? Mike Ray Cromwell wrote: > > Could you summarize at a 30,000ft level what it does and why it is > needed? I tried going to the web site, but there were no specs. > Browsing the JavaDoc gave me the impression it's intended to allow > I/O of XML from storage other than just text. > > However, one thing concerned me was that the JavaDoc didn't say > that their versions of Node, Element, et al, implemented the > org.w3c.* interfaces. IMHO, any API that doesn't atleast implement > the w3c interfaces is dead-on-arrival. > > Building at a higher level on top of DOM, extending it, wrapping it, > etc I can see, but I wouldn't use an API that didn't atleast give > me a DOM interface when I needed it. Interoperability is far more > important than syntactic sugar. > > Just my two cents. I'd appreciate a summary of it, since the web > site doesn't explain much. > > -Ray > > Ray Cromwell > MsgTo.Com, Inc. > ray@MsgTo.com > > general@jakarta.apache.org wrote: > > > >I've spent a nice evening listening to Jason Hunter and Brett > >McLaughlin's talk at the Mountain View Java User's Group about their > >idea of JDOM. > >What's JDOM? A smarter way (designed and specifically optimized for > >Java) to handle XML data. > >Since I really enjoyed their talk (trying - unsuccessfully - to play the > >devil's advocate for the whole evening) and I think they come up with a > >good API, I would suggest to all those interested in dealing w/ XML data > >and DOMs to take a look at and to help those two > >out with some feedback (and maybe some code? it's not that hard?). > >Have fun :) :) > > > > Pier > > > >-- > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >pier: stable structure erected over water to allow docking of seacraft > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org > > > > ---------- > Message To Spammers -- Game Over! Get spam-free email at http://www.MsgTo.com