Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact general-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 698 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2000 22:29:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO arkin.exoffice.com) (207.33.160.68) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2000 22:29:28 -0000 Received: from exoffice.com (IDENT:arkin@arkin.exoffice.com [192.168.1.4]) by arkin.exoffice.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA14827 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 14:34:11 -0800 Sender: arkin@arkin.exoffice.com Message-ID: <38C826E1.639EAD0@exoffice.com> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 14:34:09 -0800 From: Assaf Arkin Organization: Exoffice X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: XQL and caching posibilities. References: <12TBEg-15FpdAC@fwd07.sul.t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Totally true, but XQL seems to have been lost between XPath (more generic), XSLT and everything else that came afterwards, so it's not clear yet whether XQL will ever see life on it's own. arkin Juergen Hermann wrote: > > On Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:51:17 -0600, Eric Hodges wrote: > > >Is there any work continuing on XQL? I got the impression it had been > >swallowed up by XPath. > > XPath != XQL, like with several other standards, XPath is only PART of > XQL. Read http://www.brics.dk/~amoeller/XML/xmlql.html for a nice > overview. > Ciao, J�rgen -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org