xml-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus" <Scott_B...@lotus.com>
Subject Re: Xalan/Xerces question.
Date Tue, 29 Feb 2000 19:49:48 GMT

I think the bug was fixed a couple of weeks ago.  If I apply:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version

  <xsl:template match="/">
    <xsl:apply-templates select="//B"/>

  <xsl:template match="B">
    <xsl:value-of select="name(.)"/>



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

I get:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

Which seems to be correct.  I would wait for the release we're going to do
tonight or tomorrow.    This release should be a 1.0.0 candidate, and we
should be moving the code much less and only responding to dire bugs, so
the code should be much more robust.  We'll branch off for the 2.0.0
version where feature requests, further performance improvement,
architectural changes, code cleanup, etc., will be done.


                    Eric Hodges                                                          
                    <harmony2@swb        To:     general@xml.apache.org               
                    ell.net>             cc:     (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)          
                                         Subject:     Re: Xalan/Xerces question.         
                    01:43 PM                                                             
                    respond to                                                           

Any more info on this problem?  It's a showstopper for us if Xalan can't
handle simple XPath strings.

----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus <Scott_Boag@lotus.com>
To: <general@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Xalan/Xerces question.

> Eric Hodges <harmony2@swbell.net> wrote:
> > I tried your example and it works for some paths, but for others it
> throws a
> NullPointerException.
> I've not seen this bug before.  I'll try and take a look tonight.  In
> general selections of this type should be pretty robust.
> -scott

View raw message