I'm finding that extra clause in all of the DOM Level 2 and 3 modules. Are you sure the omission wasn't an oversight by whichever WG created SVG 1.1? You would think that the W3C would have consistent licensing policies.
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Cameron McCormack <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote on 01/13/2009 10:46:20 PM:
> Michael Glavassevich:
> > Good catch. I've updated LICENSE.dom-software.txt with the text from the
> > DOM Level 3 COPYRIGHT.html file.
> I just checked the SVG 1.1 Java interface ZIP file. Its files are
> included in java/external/src/org/w3c, but that ZIP file didn’t have the
> extra clause. You may have to have two LICENSE txt files, one that
> includes the extra clause and one that doesn’t, and indicate in
> README.dom.txt which applies to which license conditions apply to which
> directory exactly.
> I haven’t checked anything other than the DOM Level 3 Core and SVG 1.1
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/java-binding.zip
> Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/