Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:17:45 +0200
From: Jeremias Maerki <dev.jeremias@greenmail.ch>
To: commons-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Migrate xml-commons from CVS to SVN
In-Reply-To: 
 <34163.10.0.0.1.1119337542.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
References: <20050621084233.5E12.DEV.JEREMIAS@greenmail.ch>
 <34163.10.0.0.1.1119337542.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
Message-Id: <20050621091710.5E18.DEV.JEREMIAS@greenmail.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

(Retrying. Seems to me that this list is misconfigured.)

Given that you've got xml-commons commit rights, I'd say yes, although
people who are actively working in this module certainly have more to
say on this matter (I don't know your status - I've never committed to
this repo, yet). You're a committer on Cocoon and Forrest which are both
ex-XML projects. I'm a FOP committer, also an ex-XML project. Xerces and
Xalan are ex-XML projects, too. BTW, these rights are exactly the reason
for my post on general@xml yesterday:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xml-general/200506.mbox/%3c20050620093246.D115.DEV.JEREMIAS@greenmail.ch%3e

After all, xml-commons is still under the supervision of the XML PMC.

On 21.06.2005 09:05:42 Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> On Mar, 21 de Junio de 2005, 1:52, Jeremias Maerki dijo:
> > Taking Antonio's suggestion I'd like to call for a vote to migrate the
> > xml-commons CVS module to Subversion right after the externals release.
> >
> > CVS modules to be converted:
> >
> >     * xml-commons (full conversion)
> >
> > Target URL:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/commons
> >
> > The desired layout will look like this:
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/commons/
> >   +-- branches (xml-commons branches)
> >   +-- tags     (xml-commons tags)
> >   +-- trunk    (xml-commons HEAD)
> >
> >
> > +1 from me, obviously. :-)
> 
> Dunno if I can vote here. ;-)
> 
> If valid, then:
> 
> +1
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Antonio Gallardo


Jeremias Maerki