Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47485 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2003 03:05:22 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2003 03:05:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 82106 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2003 03:05:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-commons-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 82028 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2003 03:05:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 82016 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2003 03:05:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net) (207.172.4.61) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2003 03:05:04 -0000 Received: from 207-172-79-45.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([207.172.79.45] helo=latte.harvard.edu) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 1AEge1-0001CE-00; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:05:13 -0500 Message-ID: <3F9F2F50.7030009@latte.harvard.edu> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:09:04 -0500 From: "Mark R. Diggory" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh, zh-cn, zh-hk, zh-sg, zh-tw MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shane Curcuru CC: commons-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Resolver component release 1.1 coming up References: <5.2.0.9.0.20031028211745.01f2f7a8@curcuru.com> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20031028211745.01f2f7a8@curcuru.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I've been using it in combination with Xerces, Xalan and Saxon via JAXP and it works wonderfully, I have absolutely no complaints or bug encounters. Cheers! Shane Curcuru wrote: > Since we've had a Resolver beta 1.1b1 out for a while now with no > complaints, as soon as I have time I plan to bump the version number to > 1.1 and make an official release. I'll make sure there's both a Version > class available as well as sticking the version number in the jar manifest. > > Any other comments/requests? Hopefully the release will be at the > appropriate time for the Ant community to version-match with it for > their 1.6 release. > > Sorry about the Xalan issue: I was hoping someone from that team could > comment. Resolver is just a pretty simple service provider: I think > it's up to the applications that use it to ensure the correct one gets > plugged into the right places (i.e. TransformerFactory vs. > Transformers). If I get free time (ha!) I'll see if I can get someone > else to look into it. > > I'd love to get at least a simplistic Resolver automated test running, > but don't have time right now. > > - Shane > -- Mark Diggory Software Developer Harvard MIT Data Center http://www.hmdc.harvard.edu