Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72459 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2003 16:13:43 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2003 16:13:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 97584 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2003 16:13:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-commons-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 97549 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2003 16:13:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 97443 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2003 16:13:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www2.kc.aoindustries.com) (65.77.211.84) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2003 16:13:03 -0000 Received: from dialup-149.147.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au (dialup-149.147.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au [203.220.147.149]) (authenticated) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h85FcO316305 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 10:38:25 -0500 Subject: Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest From: David Crossley To: commons-dev@xml.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030905105224.01f90490@curcuru.com> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030905105224.01f90490@curcuru.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1062776292.18850.19.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 06 Sep 2003 01:38:13 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Shane Curcuru wrote: > Guys, you two ROCK! These look great. > > David - I'd say +1 to going live anytime you have time. This is far better > than the cheesy structure I put on the website long ago. Any nits can be > picked at later. Well +1 from me then too. I have overcome many of the issues that we had. There are still a few license issues, but not too bad. The new structure is still not ideal, but one step further. If i don't hear any objections soon then i will go ahead. > (For some reason, the nicely curved bottom border of the > search area has an extra square bar of light blue under it) Not sure. Damn the frilly bits. Seriously, i try to work it out. > And any hints on how to rebuild the site... oh, I see they're in there > already. Great! :-) I also have a build.txt description that i will commit to cvs or perhaps i should just merge it into that howto web page. We'll see. > Nicola - my +1 is for the first one: xml-commons-logo.gif No need to try > to stuff the graphics inside the , just let it be a background. That is interesting. The last time Nicola Ken presented the logos, i said that i did not like the idea of the empty xml-commons element and i loved the concept of a peace-pipe inside the commons. Oh dear, what a dilemma - they are all good. How about i toss a coin? We can always change it. > - Shane > (Mightily inspired to make some releases and move stuff to mirrored distros!) I had better hurry then, to maintain momentum. --David > ---- Nicola Ken Barozzi ---- > > David Crossley wrote, On 05/09/2003 5.14: > > > > > Okay i have updated the draft website. > > > > > > I do not want any google links to this draft, so please go to > > > http://www.apache.org/ > > > then go to ~crossley/commons-draft/ > > > > For the possible logos: > > > > http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/logos/xml-commons.html