Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 36931 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 23:52:03 -0000 Received: from web12107.mail.yahoo.com (216.136.172.27) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 23:52:03 -0000 Message-ID: <20020131235207.28901.qmail@web12107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [129.42.240.33] by web12107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:52:07 PST Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:52:07 -0800 (PST) From: Shane Curcuru Reply-To: shane_curcuru@lotus.com Subject: RE: Licensing Issues To: commons-dev@xml.apache.org, edwingo@apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Action Item: - Edwin - since you're the JAXP guy, can you do this for the javax.* packages? Status: - Shane has checked in good-faith-layperson README.*.txt and LICENSE.*.txt files for the Apache, SAX, and DOM portions of xml-commons as they exist today. - Do we still need to cc: the PMC with the names/urls of these license files to ensure they have the appropriate oversight, etc.? - Shane ---- you "Sam Ruby" wrote ---- > Shane (or any other commons-dev type): > Can you look into ensuring that the license associated with the source > in commons-dev is clearly marked? > Thanks! - Sam Ruby ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com