xerces-j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "K. Venugopal" <k.venugo...@sun.com>
Subject Re: Patch for 17294
Date Mon, 07 Apr 2003 05:23:32 GMT
Hi Neeraj/Glenn,

    I will provide a patch to restore the order.


Neeraj Bajaj wrote:

> Hi Glenn ,
>> As I mentioned in my Bugzilla comments, all element errors
>> have the element name as the {0} parameter, and all attribute
>> errors have the element name as the {0} parameter and the
>> attribute name as the {1} parameter.  Any *additional*
>> parameters occur after these.
>> The whole point of positional parameters in the message
>> formatting is so that the order of the parameters in the
>> call to report the error does not have to match the order
>> in a localized message for that error. 
> Good point. I will take care of it. I think its a good suggestion 
> perhaps we should document it somewhere as part of Xerces programming 
> practices so that its not lost in the archives and future committers 
> also know about this practice of writing error messages. There are 
> others like wrting if block, setting the right tab value, caused lot 
> of problem earlier :-)
> thanks
> Neeraj

View raw message